2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842008000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gluttonous predators: how to estimate prey size when there are too many prey

Abstract: Prey size is an important factor in food consumption. In studies of feeding ecology, prey items are usually measured individually using calipers or ocular micrometers. Among amphibians and reptiles, there are species that feed on large numbers of small prey items (e.g. ants, termites). This high intake makes it difficult to estimate prey size consumed by these animals. We addressed this problem by developing and evaluating a procedure for subsampling the stomach contents of such predators in order to estimate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a complete knowledge of prey items targeted by omnivorous species is unrealistic in prey-rich communities (Araújo et al 2008). Diet composition is often assessed using stomach contents, which are influenced by many temporal (Lehikoinen 2005, Horppila 2009) and spatial factors (e.g.…”
Section: Abstract: Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling · Mediterraneamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a complete knowledge of prey items targeted by omnivorous species is unrealistic in prey-rich communities (Araújo et al 2008). Diet composition is often assessed using stomach contents, which are influenced by many temporal (Lehikoinen 2005, Horppila 2009) and spatial factors (e.g.…”
Section: Abstract: Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling · Mediterraneamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predator mass scales variably with length among species (e.g., Jayne et al, 2022) but also differs within species, even within an individual seasonally, depending on physiological condition (e.g., Fitch, 1949; Dobson, 1992; Cundall, 2000; Rivas, 2020:92). Finally, RPM measurements are subject to other errors and biases, particularly with preserved specimens and proxy estimates of live weights (for a careful example, Boback et al, 2016; for subsampling stomachs with hundreds of tiny prey items, Araújo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Long Bodies Small Mouths and Mass-bulk Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%