2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842007000400019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radular ultrastructure of South American Ampullariidae (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia)

Abstract: The radula of five species of South American Ampullariidae was analysed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) with the purpose of enlarging new studies on the systematic of this family. The studied species were Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck, 1822), Pomacea scalaris (d'Orbigny, 1835), Pomella (P.) megastoma (Gray, 1847), Asolene (A.) platae (Maton, 1809) and Felipponea neritiniformis (Dall, 1919). The central tooth shows different attributes which provide the means for generic determination; the analysis of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operculum of P. maculata is also much thicker and more inflexible than that of P. canaliculata , creating a much less effective seal. Regarding alimentary system characters, previous authors have noted subtle differences in radula morphology among distantly related species within the genus Pomacea and among genera (Berthold, 1991; Martín & Negrette, 2007). In general, the rachidian base differs between the two species and the tooth cusps are generally broader, thicker, and more robust in P. canaliculata .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operculum of P. maculata is also much thicker and more inflexible than that of P. canaliculata , creating a much less effective seal. Regarding alimentary system characters, previous authors have noted subtle differences in radula morphology among distantly related species within the genus Pomacea and among genera (Berthold, 1991; Martín & Negrette, 2007). In general, the rachidian base differs between the two species and the tooth cusps are generally broader, thicker, and more robust in P. canaliculata .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact details of cusp morphology within a family, genus or group of closely related species are more variable and exhibit more superimposed fine details than tooth bases or shafts. For example, Martin & Negrete () separated five genera of taeniogloss Ampullariidae (prosobranchs) based solely on the morphology of the central rhachidian tooth. But also at the larger scale (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies were carried out on small sized pulmonates that are usually considered as microphytophagous and detritivorous grazer-scrapers thriving on algae, detritus and senescent plant material (Dillon, 2000;Pyron & Brown, 2015). On the other hand, apple snails (Ampullariidae) are large snails mostly with macrophytophagous habits (Cazzaniga & Estebenet, 1984;Cowie, 2002;Marchese et al, 2014;Hayes et al, 2015) and they possess very powerful jaws and radula with which they shred living macrophyte tissues (Andrews, 1965;Moretto & Nahabedian, 1989;Martín & Negrete, 2007). They also possess a strongly muscular and cuticularized gizzard in the stomach (Andrews, 1965) and high levels of enzymatic activity in different parts of their digestive tract (Godoy et al, 2013;Luo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%