2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842007000300024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy phenology of a dry forest in western Brazil

Abstract: Dry forests are common, although highly threatened in the Neotropics. Their ecological processes are mostly influenced by rainfall pattern, hence their cycles exhibit contrasting phases. We studied the phenology of canopy trees in a primary dry forest in Western Brazil in the foothills of the Urucum mountain chain, in order to improve our knowledge on the functioning of these poorly-known forests. Leaf shedding started in the early dry season and was massive in the latter part of this period. Most leaf loss oc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We grouped plant species according to its potential fruiting pattern: asynchronous, when they bore fruits unpredictably during the year; multiple, when they bore fruits more than once in the year and; seasonal, when they bore fruit only once in the year (Milton et al, 1982;Henderson, 2002). In seasonal areas fruiting pattern fluctuates exhibiting short periods of pronounced fruit production followed by abrupt declines (Justiniano and Fredericksen, 2000;Funch et al, 2002;Ragusa-Netto and Silva, 2007). Hence, in the course of a season fruit production fluctuations have influence on frugivores abundance and feeding activity (van Schaik et al, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We grouped plant species according to its potential fruiting pattern: asynchronous, when they bore fruits unpredictably during the year; multiple, when they bore fruits more than once in the year and; seasonal, when they bore fruit only once in the year (Milton et al, 1982;Henderson, 2002). In seasonal areas fruiting pattern fluctuates exhibiting short periods of pronounced fruit production followed by abrupt declines (Justiniano and Fredericksen, 2000;Funch et al, 2002;Ragusa-Netto and Silva, 2007). Hence, in the course of a season fruit production fluctuations have influence on frugivores abundance and feeding activity (van Schaik et al, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominance of fleshy fruit production during rains has been found in seasonal habitats such as dry forests (Renton, 2001;Ragusa-Netto and Silva, 2007), and apparently is usual for gallery forests within dry areas (Funch et al, 2002;this study). It is important to emphasize the fruit production in the transition from the wet to the dry season (March-April, Figure 1), which aroused from species exposed to floods for longer periods (pers.…”
Section: Food Resources Productionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In seasonal forests fruiting pattern fluctuates exhibiting short periods of pronounced fruit enhancement followed by abrupt declines (Funch et al, 2002;Ragusa-Netto and Silva, 2007). Hence, in the course of a season, variations in fruit production have implications for frugivores (van Schaik et al, 1993).…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In marked seasonal areas, one can expect that large nuts might offer enhanced energetic return and should be preferred by foraging rodents, mainly when food availability is relatively high (Brewer, 2001). This might be the case during the wet season when fruiting is plentiful (Batalha and Martins, 2004;Munhoz and Felfili, 2007;Ragusa-Netto and Silva, 2007). On the other hand, in periods of low fruit availability, nut size may become unimportant in the selection of seeds by foraging rodents under food shortage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An area of approximately 50 cm 2 was cleared of grass or leaf litter for the placement of each depot. Taking into account the asynchronous fruiting pattern in S. loefgrenii (Ragusa-Netto, 2016), besides the fact that intra-seasonal changes in general food resources availability, might have implications on seed consumption (Van Schaik et al, 1993;Ragusa-Netto and Silva, 2007), I tested S. loefgrenii endocarp removal in four periods of the year. Depots with endocarps were set out 3 January, 7 April, 1 July, and 4 November 2015 in order to run trials during the middle of each of the four periods of the year (the late wet season [January-March], the early dry season [April-June], the late dry season [July-September], and the early wet season [October-December]).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%