2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842002000500008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A device and standard variables to describe microhabitat structure of small mammals based on plant cover

Abstract: Studies quantifying habitat structure generally use several instruments. This paper aims to propose a new and efficient device to characterize microhabitat structure of small mammals. Seven measurements were taken: plant cover, litter cover, rock cover, canopy cover, and vegetative obstruction at three heights. The device is a 0.25 m 2 square wooden frame (0.50 m x 0.50 m) divided in to 100 open squares by wire mesh. Average time spent to measure each trapping station was six minutes. This new device is effici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Microhabitat characterization and structure is adapted from Freitas et al (2002) and Pardini et al (2005). Habitat characterization was based on 7 variables explained in Table 1 (Freitas et al 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Microhabitat characterization and structure is adapted from Freitas et al (2002) and Pardini et al (2005). Habitat characterization was based on 7 variables explained in Table 1 (Freitas et al 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat characterization was based on 7 variables explained in Table 1 (Freitas et al 2002). In each trapping station, variables were measured on 5 points of a 36 m 2 , the center and the cardinal points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Available microhabitats were quantified by using photographs taken every 2 km along the road. For the characterisation of used and available microhabitats, a grid with 25 squares was placed on each photo, and the type of ground cover was determined (adapted from Freitas et al, 2002;Bennetts et al, 2006). The predominant formation (> 50%) in each square was classified in one of the following categories: Tall vegetation on flooded substrate (TVFS), tall vegetation on dry substrate (TVDS), low vegetation on flooded substrate (LVFS), low vegetation on dry substrate (LVDS), floating vegetation (FV) and visible water surface (VWS).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the habitat structure within each marsh, photographs were taken at five spots along each transection (0 m, 50 m, 100 m, 150 m and 200 m). At each spot, the photographer faced the water body and the habitat was photographed at a fixed height of 1.5 m. To characterize the microhabitat, a 25 square screen (5 columns and 5 lines) was placed on each digital photograph (see Freitas et al, 2002;Bennetts et al, 2006). In each square, the vegetation covering more than 50% of the area was classified as in flooded soil, e) floating vegetation in flooded soil, and f) exposed water surface.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Foraging Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%