Desenvolvimento e reprodução de Sipha flava (Forbes) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) em diferentes temperaturas

Oliveira, Simone Santos; Souza, Brígida; Auad, Alexander Machado; Silva, Daniela M da; Souza, Lívia S; Carvalho, Cláudio Antônio Talge

doi:10.1590/s1519-566x2009000300002

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several previous studies have compared the characteristics of different development function types in general (Anger, 2001; Blanco et al, 1995; Guerrero et al, 1994; McLaren, 1995), while others have attempted to fit multiple function types to data for one or two specific species under study in order to select the best function for their data (e.g., Angilletta Jr., 2006; Heip, 1974; Shi and Ge, 2010; Smits et al, 2003). Many other studies seem to choose one or very few function(s) semi-arbitrarily, without discussing alternatives (e.g., de Oliveria et al, 2009; Thompson 1982; see also Results). However, no previous study has attempted to assess the degree to which one versus multiple types of development functions are used in published studies, compared performance of different types of development functions across multiple species, or assessed the overall impact of function choice to predictions made with such functions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A critical review of the use and performance of different function types for modeling temperature-dependent development of arthropod larvae

Quinn

2016

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

1-506-343-7676 7 8 Highlights: 9  Temperature-dependent development functions of arthropod larvae were reviewed 10  Data from published studies were re-tested and fit with eight different function types 11  86.5 % of published studies did not fit their data with the best function of those tested 12  Performance differed among functions and was related to taxon and temperature range tested 13  Function type impacted predicted development times, so using the best function matters 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2 ABSTRACT 24 Temperature-dependent development influences production rates of economically-and 25 ecologically-important arthropod species, including crustaceans important to fisheries and 26 agricultural pests. Numerous candidate equation types (development functions) exist to describe 27 the effect of temperature on development time, yet most studies use only a single type of 28 equation and there is no consensus as to which, if any model predicts development rates better 29 than the others, nor what the consequences of selecting a potentially incorrect model equation are 30 on predicted development times. In this study, a literature search was performed of studies fitting 31 development functions to development of arthropod larvae (87 species). The published data of 32 some (52) of these species were then fit with eight commonly-used development functions. 33 Overall performance of each function type and consequences of using a function other than the 34 best one to model data were assessed. Performance was also related to taxonomy and the range 35 of temperatures examined. The majority (86.5 %) of studies were found to not use the best 36 function out of those tested. Using the incorrect model lead to significantly less accurate (e.g., 37 mean difference ± SE 7.9 ± 1.7 %, range: 1-18 %) predictions of development times than the best 38 function. Overall, Heip Power, Quadratic, Bĕlehrádek, and Modified Arrhenius functions 39 performed well, Linear Rate and Tauti Exponential were intermediate, and the Linear Sum and 40 Brière-2 functions performed poorly. More complex functions only performed well when wide 41 temperature ranges were tested, which tended to be confined to studies of insects or arachnids 42 compared with those of crustaceans. Results indicate the biological significance of choosing the 43 best-fitting model to describe temperature-dependent development time data.44 45

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A critical review of the use and performance of different function types for modeling temperature-dependent development of arthropod larvae

Quinn

2016

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, equating these periods was reasonable in light of historical research on ICD and EPD, in which not only stage-specific proportions but also phase length ratios (e.g., nauplius vs. copepodite) were considered (Corkett, 1984; Hart, 1990). Additionally, among insects and arachnids the term ‘instar’ has a more specific meaning than it does among crustaceans, involving morphological changes that may be comparable to shifts between crustacean larval stages (e.g., Huang et al, 2008; de Oliveira et al, 2009; Eliopoulous et al, 2010). Phases, stages, and instars are separated by a moult in most species, and thus the timing of transitions between them and their durations is likely under the control of similar processes (Anger, 2001; Martin et al, 2014; Quinn, 2016, 2017).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Occurrence and predictive utility of isochronal, equiproportional, and other types of development among arthropods

Quinn

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In isochronal (ICD) and equiproportional development (EPD), the proportion of total immature (egg, larval, and/or juvenile) development spent in each stage (developmental proportion) does not vary among stages or temperatures, respectively. ICD and EPD have mainly been reported in copepods, and whether they occur in other arthropods is not known. If they did, then rearing studies could be simplified because the durations of later developmental stages could be predicted based on those of earlier ones. The goal of this study was to test whether different taxa have ICD, EPD, or an alternative development type in which stage-specific proportions depend on temperature, termed ‘variable proportional’ development (VPD), and also how well each development type allowed later-stage durations to be predicted from earlier ones. Data for 71 arthropods (arachnids, copepod and decapod crustaceans, and insects) were tested, and most (85.9 %) species were concluded to have VPD, meaning that ICD and EPD do not occur generally. However, EPD predicted later-stage durations comparably well to VPD (within 19-23 %), and thus may still be useful. Interestingly, some species showed a ‘mixed’ form of development, where some stages’ developmental proportions varied with temperature while those of others did not, which should be further investigated.HighlightsWhether arthropod development is generally isochronal or equiproportional was testedDevelopmental proportions of most species’ stages varied with temperatureMany species had ‘mixed’ development between variable and equiproportional typesThe general occurrence of isochronal and equiproportional development was rejectedEquiproportional development did make reasonable predictions of stage durations

show abstract

“…Rearing S. flava at different temperatures indicate it can complete development at 20°C and 24°C (Oliveira et al, 2009). Thus C. externa is potentially a natural control agent of this aphid pest, since the range of temperatures over which both these species can complete their development overlap.…”

Section: Duration Of the Immature Stages Of Chrysoperla Externamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These findings help in the formulation of pest management measures. But there is no study in which S. flava is the prey, which according to Oliveira et al (2009) is the main aphid species on elephant grass.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Knowledge of the biological parameters and predatory capacity of C. externa fed with S. flava, over a temperature range of 12°C to 32°C -the most suited for this aphid's development according to Oliveira et al (2009) will help in predicting the synchronization of the occurrence of the predator and prey and the effect of the predator on the population density of this aphid in the field.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of temperature on the interaction between Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Sipha flava (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Oliveira¹,

Auad²,

Souza³

et al. 2010

Eur. J. Entomol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper examines some biological aspects and the predatory capacity of Chrysoperla externa fed nymphs of Sipha flava and reared at different temperatures. Recently hatched larvae were placed individually in Petri dishes, fed ad libitum with S. flava and reared at either 12, 16, 20, 24, 28 or 32 ± 1°C, a RH of 70 ± 10% and a 12-h photophase. The experiment was fully randomized with 30 replicates of each treatment. The duration and survival in each instar, and larval and pupal stages (pre-pupa + pupa) were analyzed. To determine the predatory capacity of larvae they were each provided daily with three-day-old nymphs of the aphid, in a number greater than they could consume. Ninety C. externa larvae were kept individually in Petri dishes at 24 ± 1°C, and their daily consumption recorded during development. Temperature influenced the rate of larval and pupal development. There was a decrease in the duration of development with increase in temperature. Regression analyses, based on quadratic equations, were used to describe the effect of temperature on the duration of development in the different instars of C. externa. This revealed that the base temperature increased as the larvae developed towards the adult phase. The survival of larvae in the first and second instars was similar at 12, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32°C but none of the third instar larvae completed their development at 12°C and 32°C. The average daily and total consumption of aphids by third instar larvae was about 48 times greater than that of first instar larvae. The larvae ate an average of 10, 37 and 479 aphids in the first, second and third instars, respectively.

show abstract

Desenvolvimento e reprodução de Sipha flava (Forbes) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) em diferentes temperaturas

Cited by 14 publications

References 6 publications

A critical review of the use and performance of different function types for modeling temperature-dependent development of arthropod larvae

A critical review of the use and performance of different function types for modeling temperature-dependent development of arthropod larvae

Occurrence and predictive utility of isochronal, equiproportional, and other types of development among arthropods

Effect of temperature on the interaction between Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Sipha flava (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About