Uso do alongamento estático como fator interveniente na dor muscular de início tardio

Bonfim, Aline Evans de Oliveira; Ré, Daniela De; Gaffuri, Juliana; Costa, Marcela Medeiros de Almeida; Portolez, José Luiz Marinho; Bertolini, Gladson Ricardo Flôr

doi:10.1590/s1517-86922010000500006

Cited by 5 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It was selected because it matches with a trigger point, making it highly sensitive to pressure 12,29 and because it has a highly demanded muscle in the proposed exercise and loads. Bonfim et al 30 also used this region to assess PPT with the algometer after exercises involving the same muscle but in orthostatic position.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of acupuncture on the pain perception threshold of muscles submitted to repetitive strain

Silvério-Lopes

Mota

2018

Brazilian Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Muscle pain is one of the causes of the leave of absence in physical activities, as well as limiting factor in sports performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early and late response to the pain perception threshold after acupuncture in a single application, in subjects submitted to repetitive strain. METHODS: Clinical-experimental quantitative trial, with control group and blind, with 47 healthy women, aged between 18 and 55 years (36.3±10.6), divided deterministically by sequential alternation to the groups: acupuncture (GACP n=16), Sham (Gsham n=16) and control (CGRT n=15). The repetitive strain was performed in the Reformer equipment of the Pilates method, before and after the intervention, with 0,25x40mm needles. The GACP received the needling at point ST36 (Zusanli). The Gsham received superficial needling out of the acupuncture point, and the CGRT only performed the exercise. All patients had the needles for 20 minutes, except for the CGRT who remained only at rest. A digital pressure algometer was used at point BL57 (Chengshan). The algometry was conducted before the intervention and the exercise, immediately after, and after 24 hours. RESULTS: The GACP showed a significant increase in the pain perception threshold when compared to Gsham (p =0.021) and to CGRT (p<0.001) and after 24 hours, with CGRT (p=0.006). The results were coherent with the acupuncture theoretical foundations, suggesting the release of opioid analgesics and applicability in the recovery of post-exercise sore muscles. CONCLUSION: A single acupuncture intervention was able to increase the Pain Perception Threshold immediately and after 24 hours.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of acupuncture on the pain perception threshold of muscles submitted to repetitive strain

Silvério-Lopes

Mota

2018

Brazilian Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Primary outcomes for short-term recovery (≤1-h postintervention): strength levels (e.g., maximum voluntary contraction) and joint ROM immediately or until 1 h after exertion. Primary outcomes for delayed recovery: DOMS, strength levels, and joint ROM at 24, 48, and 72 h, which are considered theoretically relevant (Van Hooren and Peake, 2018) and are commonly assessed periods on studies investigating this subject matter (Bonfim et al, 2010;Torres et al, 2013).…”

Section: Data Extractionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, 21 records were considered eligible for analysis of the full text (20 in the initial searches and one in the updated searches). While most were written in English, one was in Portuguese (Bonfim et al, 2010), one in Greek (Kokkinidis et al, 1998), and three in Korean ( et al, 2010;Oh, 2013;Kang and Park, 2018). A translator was hired for the Korean studies, and another for the Greek study.…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, nine studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria (Kokkinidis et al, 1998;Mika et al, 2007;Bonfim et al, 2010;Cè et al, 2013;Torres et al, 2013;McGrath et al, 2014;Muanjai and Namsawang, 2015;Cooke et al, 2018;César et al, 2021). As per protocol, in studies where the recovery methods were applied in multiple sessions (e.g., stretching after exercise and repeated at 24 and 48 h), only data before the second application was considered.…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sample size ranged from 9 (Cè et al, 2013) to 57 (McGrath et al, 2014), with ages ranging from 17 to 38 years-old, i.e., all studies were performed with adults or near-adulthood (i.e., the usual legal age of 18 years old). The studies of Bonfim et al (2010) and McGrath et al (2014) had a mixed sample of men and women. The remaining studies only used male participants.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effectiveness of Post-exercise Stretching in Short-Term and Delayed Recovery of Strength, Range of Motion and Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Post-exercise (i.e., cool-down) stretching is commonly prescribed for improving recovery of strength and range of motion (ROM) and diminishing delayed onset muscular soreness (DOMS) after physical exertion. However, the question remains if post-exercise stretching is better for recovery than other post-exercise modalities.Objective: To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of supervised randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of post-exercise stretching on short-term (≤1 h after exercise) and delayed (e.g., ≥24 h) recovery makers (i.e., DOMS, strength, ROM) in comparison with passive recovery or alternative recovery methods (e.g., low-intensity cycling).Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42020222091). RCTs published in any language or date were eligible, according to P.I.C.O.S. criteria. Searches were performed in eight databases. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2. Meta-analyses used the inverse variance random-effects model. GRADE was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.Results: From 17,050 records retrieved, 11 RCTs were included for qualitative analyses and 10 for meta-analysis (n = 229 participants; 17–38 years, mostly males). The exercise protocols varied between studies (e.g., cycling, strength training). Post-exercise stretching included static stretching, passive stretching, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Passive recovery (i.e., rest) was used as comparator in eight studies, with additional recovery protocols including low intensity cycling or running, massage, and cold-water immersion. Risk of bias was high in ~70% of the studies. Between-group comparisons showed no effect of post-exercise stretching on strength recovery (ES = −0.08; 95% CI = −0.54–0.39; p = 0.750; I2 = 0.0%; Egger's test p = 0.531) when compared to passive recovery. In addition, no effect of post-exercise stretching on 24, 48, or 72-h post-exercise DOMS was noted when compared to passive recovery (ES = −0.09 to −0.24; 95% CI = −0.70–0.28; p = 0.187–629; I2 = 0.0%; Egger's test p = 0.165–0.880).Conclusion: There wasn't sufficient statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis that stretching and passive recovery have equivalent influence on recovery. Data is scarce, heterogeneous, and confidence in cumulative evidence is very low. Future research should address the limitations highlighted in our review, to allow for more informed recommendations. For now, evidence-based recommendations on whether post-exercise stretching should be applied for the purposes of recovery should be avoided, as the (insufficient) data that is available does not support related claims.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020222091.

show abstract

Cannabis use for exercise recovery in trained individuals: a survey study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Cannabis use, be it either cannabidiol (CBD) use and/or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) use, shows promise to enhance exercise recovery. The present study aimed to determine if individuals are using CBD and/or THC as a means of recovery from aerobic and/or resistance exercise, as well as additional modalities that might be used to aid in recovery. Methods Following consent, 111 participants (Mean ± SD: Age: 31 ± 13 years) completed an anonymous survey. All participants were regularly using cannabis (CBD and/or THC) as well as were currently exercising. Questions pertained to level of cannabis use, methods used for consumption of cannabis, exercise habits, exercise recovery strategies, and demographics. Results Eighty-five percent of participants reported participating in aerobic training. In addition, 85% of participants also reported regular participation in resistance exercise. Seventy-two percent of participants participated in both aerobic and resistance exercise. Ninety-three percent of participants felt that CBD use assisted them with recovery from exercise, while 87% of participants felt the same regarding THC use. Conclusions Individuals who habitually use cannabis, CBD or THC, and regularly engage in exercise do feel that cannabis assists them with exercise recovery. More data are necessary to understand the role of cannabis in exercise recovery as well as perceived ergogenic benefits of cannabis by individuals who both regularly participate in exercise and habitually use cannabis.

show abstract

Uso do alongamento estático como fator interveniente na dor muscular de início tardio

Cited by 5 publications

References 12 publications

Influence of acupuncture on the pain perception threshold of muscles submitted to repetitive strain

Influence of acupuncture on the pain perception threshold of muscles submitted to repetitive strain

The Effectiveness of Post-exercise Stretching in Short-Term and Delayed Recovery of Strength, Range of Motion and Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cannabis use for exercise recovery in trained individuals: a survey study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About