2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822008000200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lectin-binding properties of Aeromonas caviae strains

Abstract: The cell surface carbohydrates of four strains of Aeromonas caviae were analyzed by agglutination and lectin-binding assays employing twenty highly purified lectins encompassing all sugar specificities. With the exception of L-fucose and sialic acid, the sugar residues were detected in A. caviae strains. A marked difference, however, in the pattern of cell surface carbohydrates in different A. caviae isolates was observed. Specific receptors for Tritricum vulgaris (WGA), Lycopersicon esculentum (LEL) and Solan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbohydrate-rich substrates have also been suggested as receptors for Aeromonas adhesins [34]. Therefore, various models such as trout and carp skin and blood, carp kidney, and trout liver were used for adhesion tests in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carbohydrate-rich substrates have also been suggested as receptors for Aeromonas adhesins [34]. Therefore, various models such as trout and carp skin and blood, carp kidney, and trout liver were used for adhesion tests in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial adhesion processes involve also specific receptor structures on fish cells such as glycoproteins of intestinal gut mucus [ 28 ] or mucin, lactoferrin, and collagen [ 17 ]. Carbohydrate-rich substrates have also been suggested as receptors for Aeromonas adhesins [ 34 ]. Therefore, various models such as trout and carp skin and blood, carp kidney, and trout liver were used for adhesion tests in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%