2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822007000200028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of HNA and LNA bacterial groups in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean

Abstract: Bacterioplankton was studied in a large area of Southwest Atlantic Ocean between 13 and 25ºS and 28 and 42ºW. Samples were collected in 108 stations at 20 m depth. Bacteria were enumerated by flow cytometry after nucleic acid staining with syto13 and two subgroups were differentiated: low nucleic acid content (LNA) and high nucleic acid content (HNA) bacteria. Total bacterial numbers varied from 0.37 to 5.53 10 5 cells mL -1. HNA cells represented 15 to 70% of the total number while LNA cells represented 30 to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
20
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the annual average of the investigated oligotrophic open sea stations showed percentages of HNA bacteria below 50 %. This is in accordance with the predominance of the LNA group over HNA, which has also been established for other oligotrophic areas, such as the Celtic Sea, Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic (Zubkov et al 2001;Jochem et al 2004;Andrade et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, the annual average of the investigated oligotrophic open sea stations showed percentages of HNA bacteria below 50 %. This is in accordance with the predominance of the LNA group over HNA, which has also been established for other oligotrophic areas, such as the Celtic Sea, Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic (Zubkov et al 2001;Jochem et al 2004;Andrade et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Surface values for %HNA, ranging from 30 % at SD15 to 51 % at SD1, are similar to previously reported values, as is the observed increase in %HNA with depth (Van Wambeke et al, 2011). The reduced values for %HNA reported for GY are similar to those reported for other nutrient-limited regions, and may be the result of LNA cells being capable of more rapid growth than HNA under nutrient limitation (Andrade et al, 2007;Nishimura et al, 2005).…”
Section: Factors Controlling Bacterial Abundance and The Role Of Hnfsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The average proportion of HNA bacteria in the central and southern coastal area ranged approximately from 20 % to 90 % and LNA bacteria from 10 % to 80 %, while in the open sea HNA and LNA ranged from 30 % to 70 %. In our research the prevalence of the LNA group over HNA was determined, as also established in oligotrophic areas of world's seas and oceans (Zubkov et al, 2001;Jochem et al, 2004;Andrade et al, 2007). In our research of the Adriatic Sea area, the prevalence of the HNA bacterial group in the water column was shown at stations which have a higher trophic level and our finding is consistent with studies that found that the dominance of the HNA over the LNA group in eutrophic areas directly influenced by river inflow (Li et al, 1995;Šolić et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%