2001
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-74912001000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação da infiltração marginal de materiais restauradores adesivos em dentes decíduos

Abstract: ABDO, R. C. C.; SILVA, S. M. B. da. Avaliação da infiltração marginal de materiais restauradores adesivos em dentes decíduos. Pesqui Odontol Bras, v. 15, n. 2, p. 151-156, abr./jun. 2001. Analisou-se a infiltração marginal nas paredes cervical e oclusal de cavidades classe V, preparadas na face vestibular de 40 caninos decíduos extraídos e restauradas com os materiais Chelon-Fil, Vitremer, Compoglass-F e Z100. Compararam-se ainda dois métodos de avaliação da penetração do corante no teste de infiltração: es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are in agreement with those obtained by several other authors 4,19,21,24 who considered that the results obtained with Vitremer were the best ones. On the other hand, these results differ from those obtained by VIEIRA et al 27 , who stated that there was no difference as to marginal microleakage when comparing Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass, and from the results obtained by CARRARA 5 , who considered the performances of Vitremer, Compoglass and Z-100 similar to each other, although the materials and methodologies utilized were different. (1995), who observed that, for composite resins, there is no statistically significant difference related to the utilization of thermocycling.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data are in agreement with those obtained by several other authors 4,19,21,24 who considered that the results obtained with Vitremer were the best ones. On the other hand, these results differ from those obtained by VIEIRA et al 27 , who stated that there was no difference as to marginal microleakage when comparing Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass, and from the results obtained by CARRARA 5 , who considered the performances of Vitremer, Compoglass and Z-100 similar to each other, although the materials and methodologies utilized were different. (1995), who observed that, for composite resins, there is no statistically significant difference related to the utilization of thermocycling.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Currently, the main concerns regarding the performance of these materials refer to their durability and to the integrity of marginal sealing 13 , especially in cavities that involve the cement region, where clinical problems are aggravated 18 . Many studies have evaluated the microleakage of different materials 1,3,4,5,7,9,17,19,21,24,27 , suggesting modifications in the materials themselves and in the restorative techniques, in an attempt to solve this problem and increase the life span of restorations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A eleição de segundos molares decíduos para composição da amostra deveu-se à escassez de trabalhos com esses dentes na literatura 14,18,42,61,65,66,86,95 , a qual é rica em trabalhos com dentes permanentes 2,8,16,17,20,27,46,67,69,72,80,88,90,104 . Vários autores afirmam que utilizar resultados de testes de microinfiltração em dentes permanentes para dentes decíduos, poderia mascarar o verdadeiro resultado da pesquisa 36,93 .…”
Section: Discussão Discussão 59unclassified
“…A literatura mostra que muitas modificações foram propostas aos materiais e técnicas restauradoras na tentativa de solucionar este problema e, assim, aumentar a lo ngevidade das restaurações 10,18,19,28,33,50,99 .…”
Section: O Materialsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation