2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132012000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of eye irritation potential of low-irritant products: comparison of in vitro results with the in vivo draize rabbit test

Abstract: In an attempt to build the evaluation strategies to assess the human eye irritation, a reassessment of some in vitro tests is necessary, particularly concerning the non-irritants, mild and moderate irritants. Thus, the correlations between results obtained from the Draize test with the in vitro methods HET-CAM (Hens Egg Test-Chorion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from HET‐CAM irritation tests were in agreement with in vitro observations, confirming not only the sensitivity of the in vitro test but also the nonirritant properties of the developed formulation and suitability for ocular administration . These results are in accordance with those obtained by other groups working with PLGA‐NPs for ocular applications . We anticipate that encapsulation of memantine within the NP aqueous interior acts to slow memantine release and therefore reduces cell exposure to potentially cytotoxic concentrations of this agent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results from HET‐CAM irritation tests were in agreement with in vitro observations, confirming not only the sensitivity of the in vitro test but also the nonirritant properties of the developed formulation and suitability for ocular administration . These results are in accordance with those obtained by other groups working with PLGA‐NPs for ocular applications . We anticipate that encapsulation of memantine within the NP aqueous interior acts to slow memantine release and therefore reduces cell exposure to potentially cytotoxic concentrations of this agent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The application of 0.3 mL of free memantine onto the chorioallantoic membrane, induced small hemorrhages (Figure B) suggestive of mild irritation. In contrast instillation of the same volume and concentration of MEM‐NPs was found to be well‐tolerated and induced no detectable irritation (Figure C,D) . Upon completion of these in vitro tests, a tolerance assay was conducted in male albino rabbits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Top-down approaches are for the identification of severe irritants, bottom-up approaches are for the identification of non-irritating substances (Barile, 2010;Engelke et al, 2013). This results in two testing strategies to replace one in vivo test and as of yet, neither strategy can be used to distinguish between non-irritants and mild irritants and this remains an on-going challenge (Barile, 2010;Nóbrega et al, 2012;Scott et al, 2010). The commercial aims of in vitro testing are to be faster and cheaper, although currently, the costs are roughly on par with Draize testing.…”
Section: Future Of In Vitro Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For developing or newly industrialized countries, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the underlying challenge is getting them to understand the roles of in vitro tests, which is a continuing educational challenge. In order to overcome these issues, a re-evaluation of currently used in vitro tests may be required (Nóbrega et al, 2012).…”
Section: Future Of In Vitro Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%