2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132011000200025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of foraging habitat use by ciconiiformes in the upper Paraná river Floodplain, Brazil

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both species were not selective regarding dry or flooded substrates, as also observed by other study (Gimenes and Anjos, 2011). However, these species are strongly biased toward flooded habitats (Motta-Junior, 2008;Carvalho, 2010;Gimenes and Anjos, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both species were not selective regarding dry or flooded substrates, as also observed by other study (Gimenes and Anjos, 2011). However, these species are strongly biased toward flooded habitats (Motta-Junior, 2008;Carvalho, 2010;Gimenes and Anjos, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Both species were not selective regarding dry or flooded substrates, as also observed by other study (Gimenes and Anjos, 2011). However, these species are strongly biased toward flooded habitats (Motta-Junior, 2008;Carvalho, 2010;Gimenes and Anjos, 2011). It should be pointed out that in many studies on habitat use by egrets, little or no importance was given to analysing the use of the microhabitat (Moreno et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Obtaining food resources in floodplain wetlands can be difficult, despite the high productivity of these ecosystems, because the frequency and magnitude of water‐level fluctuations may severely constrain the ability of species, including waterbirds, to survive in these environments (Kushlan, ). During periods when environmental conditions of floodplains hinder the acquisition of required resources, species may move in search of better conditions either along the river system or into surrounding uplands (Antas, ; Gimenes & dos Anjos, ). Availability of feeding habitats may be a particularly good predictor of waterbird responses to hydrological fluctuations because waterbirds are likely to respond quickly to changes in availability of foraging sites as water levels change (Weller, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, among the different mechanistic pathways that contribute to hydrologically driven variation in local distribution patterns of waterbirds, habitat‐mediated effects may be important because of the variation in habitat produced by fluctuations in water levels. Accordingly, studies that have assessed waterbird responses to hydrological fluctuations in wetlands have frequently explained those responses in terms of water‐level effects on the availability of feeding habitats (Cumming et al, ; Gimenes & dos Anjos, ; Royan et al, ). Here, we show that responses of waterbirds to hydrological fluctuations of the Middle Paraná River can be explained by the influence of water level on floodplain habitats, although this relationship may vary as a function of the different habitat requirements of the waterbird species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both indices were significantly lower in February 2002 than in most other months. Connected lagoons have permanent surface contact with rivers and influx of prey for the Pelecaniformes and Ciconiiformes, and have been previously identified as patches of better quality for wading birds due to greater abundance of fish (Gimenes & Anjos ). February 2002 was the first flooded month following a dry year (2001), and the higher water level may have decreased prey accessibility (Gawlik ), negatively influencing the capacity of waterbirds to capture prey, and thus decreasing the quality of the habitat for wading birds, driving low functional diversity (Figs and ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%