2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132006000200014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty of the density of moist air: Gum x Monte Carlo

Abstract: In this study two methods of evaluation of uncertainty, the law of propagation of uncertainties (as recommended by GUM) and the method of Monte Carlo, are compared. As a particular case the determination of the density of moist air was consideredThe results show that there are some differences between both methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4,117,120,175,181,191,192,246,292,297,300,303]. 31 For the case of water coupled NDT ultrasound see Refs. [78,133,171,223,224,290,304].…”
Section: Air-coupled Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[4,117,120,175,181,191,192,246,292,297,300,303]. 31 For the case of water coupled NDT ultrasound see Refs. [78,133,171,223,224,290,304].…”
Section: Air-coupled Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly because of the different approaches used during implementation of the attenuation process. For the Field II & DREAM cases a linear model was used (α = 2.628f −1.006) near the central frequency (f 0 ∼ = 0.8 MHz) in the bandwidth, while for the LAMB toolbox the model of equation (2.34) was employed 31 .…”
Section: Simulations and Experimental Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations