Resolução temporal em perdas auditivas neurossensoriais e lesões cerebrais

Critérios de normalidade dos testes de resolução temporal: random gap detection test e gaps-in-noise

“…This gap detection threshold is found in studies by Queiroz et al (2009) 21 containing sample similar to this study regarding age, average acuity and female group study of Zaidan et al (2008) 4 with younger women. Results did not corroborate studies Balen et al (2008) 10 and Gallo (2012) 14 , studies to be relatively younger age groups, when compared to age 40 to 60 years contained in the groups G3 and G4 in this study.…”

“…The results across the sample, ie, the 4 groups (G1, G2, G3 and G4) differ from works done in individuals with: language delay, injury of the right and left temporal lobe, changes in central auditory processing, loss mild sensorineural hearing symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss 13,14,20 .…”

“…and Schochat (2008) 7 , Zaidan and cols (2008) 4 and Gallo (2012) 14 , which had no statistically significant difference between the ears for the GIN test. These results obtained in this study suggest that the noise test can be applied binaurally in clinical practice.…”

“…In the GIN test, as the gap detection threshold, GIN_LI (Table 3) and percentage gap recognition, GIN_% accuracy (Table 4) hearing loss, moderate or moderately severe, symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss, individuals with right temporal lobe lesion and left and elderly (between 60 and 79), and the value of these studies is below GIN_% of 59% 5,9,14,16 .…”