2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-44462003000600002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comunicação simbólica em primatas não-humanos: uma análise baseada na semiótica de C. S. Peirce

Abstract: Existem (ou existiram) outras espécies de criaturas simbólicas? Essa questão tem sido abordada por pesquisadores de diversas áreas e é responsável por uma histórica controvérsia sobre a existência de um limiar entre "criaturas simbólicas" vs "criaturas capazes de produzir formas simples de linguagem". Conforme o mainstream em Etologia e Psicologia Comparada apenas o Homo sapiens está cognitivamente equipado para produzir e interpretar símbolos. Vou introduzir um modelo empiricamente testável de semiose simbóli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of semiotic behavior we have made point out that some non-human animals can be seen as communicating using symbols as defined by Peirce's theory , Queiroz 2003. They mostly constitute simple cases of symbol usage without further symbol-related properties, such as recursion or compositionality.…”
Section: Constraint C Referential Communication In Non-human Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of semiotic behavior we have made point out that some non-human animals can be seen as communicating using symbols as defined by Peirce's theory , Queiroz 2003. They mostly constitute simple cases of symbol usage without further symbol-related properties, such as recursion or compositionality.…”
Section: Constraint C Referential Communication In Non-human Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have claimed elsewhere that the alarm-call system used by African vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops), a well-known case of vocal communication in non-human primates, logically satisfies the Peircean definition of symbol (Queiroz 2003(Queiroz , 2004Ribeiro et al 2007). These primates possess a sophisticated repertoire of vocal signs used for intra-specific alarm purposes regarding imminent predation on the group (Seyfarth et al 1980).…”
Section: Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed by Quine (1951), the pragmatic approach opens a new perspective towards these issues, presenting new elements to construct a less rigid conceptual schema and sustaining criteria no longer bound to a notion of correspondence that aspires to produce a "mirror" of reality. The traditional notion of meaning as something stable and fixed loses strength in the face of a dynamic conception that embraces the continuous cognitive processes for interpretation of meaning (QUEIROZ;MERRELL, 2006). Peircean philosophy proposes a radical transformation of the idea of meaning as being something like a list of properties, changing the perspective to an organic sense of semantics -layers of iconic descriptions of habits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%