2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-44462003000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of brain injury in a forensic psychiatric population

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Over the last years, a growing number of studies involving individual patients and/or populations have demonstrated that Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI) determine innumerable psychiatric symptoms, including significant alterations which may influence diagnoses, prognosis and treatment, not to mention clear psychosocial implications (both legal and those related to social security). The objectives of this study were 1) to detect the existence of TBI in a forensic psychiatric population before the occu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were concomitant reports of difficulties with memory and socialization. De Souza [18] examined the existence of TBI in a forensic psychiatric population in Brazil through analysis of medical records. Of 3233 offenders there were 133 cases of TBI reported (39 'mild' and 94 'moderate or severe').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were concomitant reports of difficulties with memory and socialization. De Souza [18] examined the existence of TBI in a forensic psychiatric population in Brazil through analysis of medical records. Of 3233 offenders there were 133 cases of TBI reported (39 'mild' and 94 'moderate or severe').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results from the Egger’s test were nonsignificant ( p = .16), indicating that the relationship between sample size and prevalence is not statistically significant. Results of the leave-one-out sensitivity analyses indicated that no individual studies disproportionately affected the pooled estimate, with the exception of de Souza (2003). When that study was excluded, the prevalence estimate was reduced to 28.5%…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In comparison with the general population, prevalence of ABI in the offender population is considerably higher (21), and those estimations are likely to be underestimations because research in offender populations typically only focuses on TBI, and information about non-traumatic brain injury is usually not available. With regard to a specific subgroup of the offender population, namely forensic psychiatric patients who undergo treatment, comparable high prevalence rates have been reported (21,22). The prevalence and extent of brain pathology in institutionalized offenders, compared to non-offenders, was significantly higher with a prevalence of 46% vs. 8% (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%