2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982014000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and environmental variance and covariance parameters for some reproductive traits of Holstein and Jersey cattle in Antioquia (Colombia)

Abstract: -The objective of this study was to estimate the genetic, phenotypic and environmental parameters for calving interval (CI), days open (DO), number of services per conception (NSC) and conception rate (CR) The results show that the genetic, phenotypic and permanent environmental correlations in the two evaluated breeds were favorable for CI × DO, CI × NSC and DO × NSC, but not for CI × CR, DO × CR and NSC × CR. Genetic and permanent environmental correlations were high in most cases in Holstein cattle, where… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

16
13
10
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
16
13
10
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimate of repeatability for SF in this study (0.021) was lower than obtained result in the Holstein breed by Jamdar and Eskandarinasab (2014) (0.077). For IO, the repeatability value found for Holstein dairy cattle (0.411) was higher than those reported by Ríos-Ultrera, Calderón, Rosete, and Lagunes (2010b) and Zambrano and Echeverri (2014) which were 0.03 in Brown Swiss cattle and 0.076 in Holstein-Jersey, respectively. Finally, the estimated repeatability for CBW was 0.142, which was lower than 0.29 obtained by Johanson et al (2011).…”
Section: Additive Genetic and Phenotypic Correlationscontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimate of repeatability for SF in this study (0.021) was lower than obtained result in the Holstein breed by Jamdar and Eskandarinasab (2014) (0.077). For IO, the repeatability value found for Holstein dairy cattle (0.411) was higher than those reported by Ríos-Ultrera, Calderón, Rosete, and Lagunes (2010b) and Zambrano and Echeverri (2014) which were 0.03 in Brown Swiss cattle and 0.076 in Holstein-Jersey, respectively. Finally, the estimated repeatability for CBW was 0.142, which was lower than 0.29 obtained by Johanson et al (2011).…”
Section: Additive Genetic and Phenotypic Correlationscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The phenotypic correlation between CI and DO in this study was high and positive, with value of 0.99. González-Recio and Alenda (2005), Ghiasi et al (2011), Eghbalsaied (2011 and Zambrano and Echeverri (2014) reported similar estimates for Holstein dairy cattle (0.91, 0.95, 0.99 and 1 respectively). Likewise, the phenotypic correlation between NI and CI was high (0.83).…”
Section: Additive Genetic and Phenotypic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…These results may be associated with the fact that growth and lactation occur in parallel in first parities, since usually the adult size of females has not been reached and σ σ = nutrients consumed during this period can be used for maintenance, growth and lactation, which affects fertility and causes the extension of postpartum anestrus. In addition, DO derived from this study may differ from those reported by other authors considering that the aforementioned trait depends largely on livestock feed, as well as health and reproductive management, which often vary among herds (Zambrano and Echeverri, 2014).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…There is much literature on the estimation of variance components in reproductive traits in dairy cattle (Oseni et al, 2004;Chang et al, 2006;Restrepo et al, 2008;Estrada-León et al, 2008;Ghiasi et al, 2011;Zambrano and Echeverri, 2014) and most agree that heritability varies between 0.03 and 0.08. Literature on beef cattle is scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SC showed a low genetic association and a moderate environmental relationship with the ICC and CI (Table 4). Genetic and environmental correlation between CI and ICC close to the unit indicates that the same genes and environmental factors affect the expression of both characteristics (8,31) . Estimates of genetic correlations between CI and ICC are scarce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%