2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982013001100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation

Abstract: -The objective of this study was to assess whether the straining of rumen content samples influences the estimation of protozoal density. Ninety rumen samples were obtained from 30 cattle (three samples per animal). The samples were subjected to one of three treatments at the moment of collection: 1) fixation in formalin without straining (control treatment), 2) straining before fixation in formalin, or 3) straining after fixation in formalin. To test the hypothesis of the variation in the protozoa composition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to archaea and bacteria, ciliate protozoa vary across ruminants of different species as well as individuals of the same species [19]. A study in cattle indicated that Entodinium, Diplodinium, Eremoplastron, Ostracodinium, Eodinium, Epidinium, Isotricha, and Dasytricha were among the most abundant genera (> 1%) of a total of 13 identified in the ruminal fluid by microscopic identification and counting [38]. Conversely, in sheep and goats, 12 and 8 genera were identified, being Dasytricha, Entodinium, Eudiplodinum, Diplodinium, Isotricha, and Metadinium the more abundant (> 1%) in both species, and Enoploplastron, Ophryoscolex, and Polyplastron only in sheep [39].…”
Section: Protozoamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to archaea and bacteria, ciliate protozoa vary across ruminants of different species as well as individuals of the same species [19]. A study in cattle indicated that Entodinium, Diplodinium, Eremoplastron, Ostracodinium, Eodinium, Epidinium, Isotricha, and Dasytricha were among the most abundant genera (> 1%) of a total of 13 identified in the ruminal fluid by microscopic identification and counting [38]. Conversely, in sheep and goats, 12 and 8 genera were identified, being Dasytricha, Entodinium, Eudiplodinum, Diplodinium, Isotricha, and Metadinium the more abundant (> 1%) in both species, and Enoploplastron, Ophryoscolex, and Polyplastron only in sheep [39].…”
Section: Protozoamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A procedure developed for isolation of cultivatable mixed ruminal protozoa for quantitative PCR and competi-tion studies (Sylvester et al, 2004(Sylvester et al, , 2005Denton et al, 2015) can be used to isolate protozoa for more accurate nutrient analysis. In addition, several of the methods employ the use of formalin in the isolation and storage of microbial and specifically protozoal samples (Martin et al, 1994;Rossi et al, 2013); this might be problematic, as formaldehyde is known to react with AA (Barry, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are dominant. According to previous reports, Entodinium can constitute up to 90% of the total ciliate protozoa 38 . However the abundance of Entodinium in our study was quite low (28.22%), which might be due to the fact that all previous studies were based on construction of clone libraries, which might have overrepresented the predominant genera and neglected rare organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%