Evaluation of APACHE II system among intensive care patients at a teaching hospital

Abstract

CONTEXT: The high-complexity features of intensive care unit services and the clinical situation of patients themselves render correct prognosis fundamentally important not only for patients, their families and physicians, but also for hospital administrators, fund-providers and controllers. Prognostic indices have been developed for estimating hospital mortality rates for hospitalized patients, based on demographic, physiological and clinical data. OBJECTIVE: The APACHE II system was applied within an intensive care unit to evaluate its ability to predict patient outcome; to compare illness severity with outcomes for clinical and surgical patients; and to compare the recorded result with the predicted death rate. DESIGN: Diagnostic test. SETTING: Clinical and surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary-care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study involved 521 consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit from July 1998 to June 1999. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: APACHE II score, in-hospital mortality, receiver operating characteristic curve, decision matrices and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 50 ± 19 years and the APACHE II score was 16.7 ± 7.3. There were 166 clinical patients (32%), 173 (33%) post-elective surgery patients (33%), and 182 post-emergency surgery patients (35%), thus producing statistically similar proportions. The APACHE II scores for clinical patients (18.5 ± 7.8) were similar to those for non-elective surgery patients (18.6 ± 6.5) and both were greater than for elective surgery patients (13.0 ± 6.3) (p < 0.05). The higher this score was, the higher the mortality rate was (p < 0.05). The predicted death rate was 25.6% and the recorded death rate was 35.5%. Through the use of receiver operating curve analysis, good discrimination was found (area under the curve = 0.80). From the 2 x 2 decision matrix, 72.2% of patients were correctly classified (sensitivity = 35.1%; specificity = 92.6%). Linear regression analysis was equivalent to r² = 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: APACHE II was useful for stratifying these patients. The illness severity and death rate among clinical patients were higher than those recorded for surgical patients. Despite the stratification ability of the APACHE II system, it lacked accuracy in predicting death rates. The recorded death rate was higher than the predicted rate.

The inflammatory response is influenced by FXIII VAL 34 LEU polymorphism in a human LPS model

“…1). Leucocyte counts have been described as predictors of outcome in sepsis [29], and thus our findings indicate that the FXIII 34 Val/Leu variant could also exert beneficial effects in septicemia. This remains to be confirmed in further studies.…”

Transporte intra-hospitalar de pacientes sob ventilação invasiva: repercussões cardiorrespiratórias e eventos adversos

“…(22) Patient scores The patients were also divided in subgroups and compared regarding the following cardiorespiratory variables: HR, RR, SBP, DBP, SpO 2 , pH, PaCO 2 , PaO 2 , SaO 2 and PaO 2 /FiO 2 . The subgroups analyzed and the differences found are described in Table 3.…”

“…Therefore, in the interest of patient safety, a transport ventilator was used, or the mechan-373 advanced life support and capable of promptly establishing an artificial airway, (22,23,(28)(29)(30) which was not always the case in the transports we evaluated. In addition, although all of the transports were also conducted in the presence of a resident, this was often a first-year resident without sufficient experience to deal with critically ill patients.…”

Profile and severity of the patients of intensive care units: prospective application of the APACHE II index

“…Patients over 60 often have a higher likelihood of comorbidity (11) . As observed in this study, for the evaluation of the APACHE II index, patients admitted to…”