2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392014005000020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous loss hysteresis loop

Abstract: This paper discusses the anomalous loss behavior in two electrical steels types. Starting from a non oriented electrical steel coil, three groups of samples with different grain sizes were produced. Grain oriented steel samples were produced from a commercially available material. The experimental procedure was performed by means of magnetic properties measurements using an Epstein frame. A procedure to draw the hysteresis curve of the anomalous loss is proposed. The results reported that anomalous loss has a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 presents the segregated losses of both the annealed and unannealed samples at 1 and 1.5 T. The hysteresis loss reduction after annealing is well documented [28,30] and can mostly be attributed to the material grain growth and the relief of internal stress. The segregated losses confirm the reduction of hysteresis losses after the annealing process: dropping by 74% at 1T and 61% at 1.5 T. In general, the classical eddy current losses are shown to increase after annealing [31]. In this study the eddy current losses however decreased by 20% at 1 T and approximately doubled in magnitude at 1.5 T after the annealing process.…”
Section: Ac Propertiessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Table 4 presents the segregated losses of both the annealed and unannealed samples at 1 and 1.5 T. The hysteresis loss reduction after annealing is well documented [28,30] and can mostly be attributed to the material grain growth and the relief of internal stress. The segregated losses confirm the reduction of hysteresis losses after the annealing process: dropping by 74% at 1T and 61% at 1.5 T. In general, the classical eddy current losses are shown to increase after annealing [31]. In this study the eddy current losses however decreased by 20% at 1 T and approximately doubled in magnitude at 1.5 T after the annealing process.…”
Section: Ac Propertiessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Magnetic domains are regions in a magnetic material that are uniformly magnetised or obtained magnetic polarity spontaneously [4]. It is generally accepted that magnetic loss, iron loss, eddy current and hysteresis loss are significantly affected by microstructural characteristics such as microtexture and grain size [5]. Furthermore, it is reported that an abnormal grain growth phenomenon during final high-temperature annealing at the end of the GOES manufacturing process leads to large grains with desired crystal orientation i.e., {110} <001> GOSS texture [6], as shown in Figure 1a.…”
Section: Effect Of Microstructure and Crystallographic Texture On Magmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these elements would add to the complexity of the core losses model (Brissonneau and Lebouc, 1984;Fiorillo et al, 2002;Appino et al, 2016). The anomalous loss behaviour in two different electrical steel types was discussed, and the results reported that in non-oriented (NO) steels, anomalous loss is concentrated in the low induction region, but in grain-oriented (GO) steels, a remarkable participation of high induction region is observed, which can provide the evidence for the core losses measurement and modelling of electrical steel sheets (Almeida et al, 2014). A general method to calculate core losses in soft magnetic composites (SMCs) was proposed (de la Barrière et al, 2013); however, the induction waveform is mostly nonsinusoidal, and the influence of skin effect to core losses has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%