2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392011005000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative interpretation of martensite microstructure

Abstract: This work reviews issues and advances a formalism for quantitative interpretation of martensite microstructure, heeding the influence of transformation uniformity and the interaction of martensite with its surroundings. The relationship of volume fraction and number density of martensite units required for kinetics analysis is derived. Additionally we apply the new model to obtain the microstructural path function (MPF) of martensite, and to analyze the autocatalytic spread of the transformation during the mar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It results from the way of passing stress (through the grain boundaries) caused by the greater specific volume of martensite in relation to austenite. Accordingly, it can be stated that the greater degree of heterogeneity of crystallographic orientation variants of the formed martensite corresponds to a larger number of initial nuclei [8][9][10]. A characteristic feature of martensite created in this way is the three-level hierarchy of morphology, consisting of laths, blocks, and packets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It results from the way of passing stress (through the grain boundaries) caused by the greater specific volume of martensite in relation to austenite. Accordingly, it can be stated that the greater degree of heterogeneity of crystallographic orientation variants of the formed martensite corresponds to a larger number of initial nuclei [8][9][10]. A characteristic feature of martensite created in this way is the three-level hierarchy of morphology, consisting of laths, blocks, and packets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of untransformed austenite after the final quenching to room temperature is strongly related to the distribution of carbon concentration in microstructures after the partitioning step, which is also closely related to process parameters, such as partitioning temperature and time [25]. Thus, the proposed phase field modeling in this study derives a reasonable distribution of carbon concentration during microstructural evolution for Q&P processes.…”
Section: Transformation Behaviors and Carbon Redistribution During Pa...mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Takahama and Mecozzi et al [23,24] attempted to simulate carbon redistribution and microstructural evolution in the partitioning step with a modified phase field model, different paths for carbon partitioning and corresponding diffusion-controlled interface migration were predicted in their simulations. However, there is a clear gap between simulation results by their phase field model and the real martensitic transformation behavior, such as the process of nucleation and growth for martensite, due to the ignoring of elastic strain energy in model [25]. Recently, Amos et al [26] adopted a phase field micorelasticity model to simulate athermal martensitic transformation during the quenching step, the subsequent carbon redistribution process in partitioning was also predicted with the constrained carbon equilibrium (CCE) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a single-phase interface, with crystals on each side of the boundary being identical, except in orientation. It is generally accepted that the grain boundaries are impervious to martensite propagation in a polycrystalline material [27][28][29]. Since the martensitic transformation is a displacive transformation accomplished by the cooperative atomic movements, it is disrupted at the boundaries between regions of the matrix with different orientations, i.e.…”
Section: Polycrystal Model and The Effect Of The Grain Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%