2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392010000200021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of specimens' design and manufacturing process on microtensile bond strength to enamel: laboratory and FEA comparison

Abstract: This study evaluated the effect of specimens' design and manufacturing process on microtensile bond strength, internal stress distributions (Finite Element Analysis -FEA) and specimens' integrity by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LCM). Excite was applied to flat enamel surface and a resin composite build-ups were made incrementally with 1-mm increments of Tetric Ceram. Teeth were cut using a diamond disc or a diamond wire, obtaining 0.8 mm 2 stick-shaped spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
2
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…11,21 The lack of adequate consistency between MTBS studies and the desire to clearly understand the correlation between a particular bond strength test and clinical performance have prompted recommendations to clarify the specimen fabrication details. 21,[36][37][38][39] In the current study, microrods were trimmed into hourglass shapes before MTBS testing to concentrate the stresses at the sites of bonding and to correlate failures to bonding interfaces with fewer incidences of cohesive failures, although this practice may have generated stress concentrations and increased pretest failures. 39 The higher MTBS values at the enamel margins compared with the cementum margins found in all study groups were not significant, regardless of the bonding technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,21 The lack of adequate consistency between MTBS studies and the desire to clearly understand the correlation between a particular bond strength test and clinical performance have prompted recommendations to clarify the specimen fabrication details. 21,[36][37][38][39] In the current study, microrods were trimmed into hourglass shapes before MTBS testing to concentrate the stresses at the sites of bonding and to correlate failures to bonding interfaces with fewer incidences of cohesive failures, although this practice may have generated stress concentrations and increased pretest failures. 39 The higher MTBS values at the enamel margins compared with the cementum margins found in all study groups were not significant, regardless of the bonding technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As técnicas estudadas para seu armazenamento até o uso vão desde o congelamento 69 , refrigeração 49 até o armazenamento em temperatura ambiente. Para tanto, pode-se utilizar substâncias tais como água destilada 18,29,49,56,58,59 solução fisiológica 34 , timol 29,33,50,62,67 , e cloramina t 6,9,12,15,16,17,18,20,24,27,30,[37][38][39]41,[44][45][46]55,61,64,71,72 . Os protocolos com timol e cloramina T são indicados para evitar crescimento bacteriano, sem alterar a morfologia do substrato 33, 50,62 .…”
Section: Substância Para Armazenamento Da Amostraunclassified
“…O protocolo de armazenamento mais atual para os dentes humanos é a utiliza-ção da cloramina T a 0,5%, sob refrigeração (4°C) 6,9,12,15,16,17,18,20,24,27,30,[37][38][39]41,[44][45][46]55,61,64,71,72 , mas também é comum o armazenamento em água destilada 18,29,49,56,58,59 . No entanto, um estudo recente de Mobarak et al 29 (2010) concluiu que o tempo e a forma de armazenamento não afetam os resultados obtidos no teste de microtração, ao comparar dentes recém-extraídos, dentes armazenados por 2 anos em cloramina-T a 0,5% sob refrigeração e dentes secos posteriormente reidratados no momento da execução do experimento.…”
Section: Substância Para Armazenamento Da Amostraunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations