2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392008000100012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain size effect on the structural parameters of the stress induced epsilonhcp: martensite in iron-based shape memory alloy

Abstract: The aim of this work was to study the effect of austenitic grain size (GS) reduction on the structural parameters of the ε hcp -martensite in stainless shape memory alloy (SMA). Rietveld refinement data showed an expansion in c-axis and a reduction in a and b-axis with thermo-mechanical cycles for all samples analyzed. Samples with 75 ≤ GS (µm) ≤ 129 were analyzed. It was also observed an increase of the unit cell volume in this phase with GS reduction. The smallest grain size sample (GS = 75 µm) presented a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in a small quantity, some monovariant martensite plates were observed within the finer grains region. However, according to previous works 13,26 , the decrease in the grain size would improve shape recovery owing to the shape memory effect and, therefore, a pronounced monovariant γ to ε phase transformation at the small grain sizes region was expected, but this did not happen. This behaviour could be explained considering that the γ → ε martensitic transformation presents a positive volume variation.…”
Section: Microstructural Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Although in a small quantity, some monovariant martensite plates were observed within the finer grains region. However, according to previous works 13,26 , the decrease in the grain size would improve shape recovery owing to the shape memory effect and, therefore, a pronounced monovariant γ to ε phase transformation at the small grain sizes region was expected, but this did not happen. This behaviour could be explained considering that the γ → ε martensitic transformation presents a positive volume variation.…”
Section: Microstructural Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, the magnitude of ΔV represents the reversibility of the martensitic transformation and is important for shape memory effect 32 . And, while martensite reversibility was predicted from changes in c/a ratio previously 33 , transformation volume is a more appropriate measure of reversibility 22 . Lower |ΔV| corresponds to higher reversibility and shape memory effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1990, Otsuka et al further developed stainless Fe – Mn – Si–Cr–(Ni) SMAs, such as Fe–28Mn–6Si–5Cr, Fe–20Mn–5Si–8Cr–5Ni, and Fe–16Mn–5Si–12Cr–5Ni . Furthermore, effects of other alloying elements such as interstitial atoms, rare earth elements, copper, and cobalt on SME were investigated in the Fe – Mn – Si‐based SMAs. In addition to the SME, a lot of researches on factors influencing the recovery stress of Fe – Mn – Si‐based SMAs have also been done .…”
Section: Role Of Si In Achieving Large Recovery Strains In Fe–mn–si‐bmentioning
confidence: 99%