2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572009005000064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias in the prediction of genetic gain due to mass and half-sib selection in random mating populations

Abstract: The prediction of gains from selection allows the comparison of breeding methods and selection strategies, although these estimates may be biased. The objective of this study was to investigate the extent of such bias in predicting genetic gain. For this, we simulated 10 cycles of a hypothetical breeding program that involved seven traits, three population classes, three experimental conditions and two breeding methods (mass and half-sib selection). Each combination of trait, population, heritability, method a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the population is structured in full-sib families, this function is biased when there are allelic and non-allelic gene interaction (dominance and epistasis). Assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and absence of epistasis, the mean of the population obtained after selection can be expressed as (Viana et al 2009)…”
Section: Theoretical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the population is structured in full-sib families, this function is biased when there are allelic and non-allelic gene interaction (dominance and epistasis). Assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and absence of epistasis, the mean of the population obtained after selection can be expressed as (Viana et al 2009)…”
Section: Theoretical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming population in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium the mean of the population obtained by mass selection on only one gender can be expressed as (Viana et al. 2009): …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M is the mean of the base population and E ( A s ) is the expectation of the additive genetic values of the selected individuals. In the case of among half‐sib selection, with recombination of all progenies, the mean of the improved population can be expressed as (Viana et al. 2009): …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I1 showed the highest selection gain (4.87) based on the first 10 classified clones (Table 3). Selection gain refers to the increase in the general average of the original population, and it depends on heritability and selection differential (Viana, Faria, & Silva, 2009). Thus, despite the high 𝐶𝑉, I1 seems to be a trait with the most genetic variability, and selection for this trait combined with rust resistance can lead to genotypes with early production, which would enable fruit supply to the consumer market before the production peak, resulting in greater returns to producers and satisfaction to consumers in terms of quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%