2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572009005000057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of 31 STR loci in the genetic isolate of Carloforte (Sardinia, Italy)

Abstract: The genotypes of 31 autosomal short tandem repeat loci in the population of Carloforte were analyzed, these representing a linguistic and genetic isolate located on the island of Sardinia (Italy). The markers span the entire length of chromosomes 19, 20, 21 and 22. Allele frequencies and statistical parameters were presented for all loci. Observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.279 to 0.884, and polymorphism information content from 0.552 to 0.886. All but two loci showed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a part of the comprehensive anthropological research on the population structure of Croatian island isolates, microsatellite DNA from different subpopulations has been previously analyzed to determine genetic diversity, population structure, and the degree of isolation of island populations (9). Similar studies were also conducted on a representative sample of the general Croatian population and other isolated populations from Southeastern Europe (10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As a part of the comprehensive anthropological research on the population structure of Croatian island isolates, microsatellite DNA from different subpopulations has been previously analyzed to determine genetic diversity, population structure, and the degree of isolation of island populations (9). Similar studies were also conducted on a representative sample of the general Croatian population and other isolated populations from Southeastern Europe (10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%