2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572009000300029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of binding hot spot residues by using structural and evolutionary parameters

Abstract: In this work, we present a method for predicting hot spot residues by using a set of structural and evolutionary parameters. Unlike previous studies, we use a set of parameters which do not depend on the structure of the protein in complex, so that the predictor can also be used when the interface region is unknown. Despite the fact that no information concerning proteins in complex is used for prediction, the application of the method to a compiled dataset described in the literature achieved a performance of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These physicochemical features also correlate well with distinct geometric aspects of PPI binding sites, such as residue buriedness, side chain protrusion, and surface curvature [ 258 ]. Due to the diversity exhibited by PPIs, it is difficult to rely on any individual feature for binding site and hot spot prediction, and it has repeatedly been shown that the combination of several attributes has more success in providing adequate information for PPI surfaces [ 259 ]. Knowledge-based PPI binding site and hot spot prediction algorithms are exemplified in tools like ANCHOR [ 260 ], HomPPI [ 261 ], KFC2 (Knowledge-based FADE and Contacts) [ 262 , 263 , 264 ], HotPoint [ 265 ], FTMAP [ 266 ], MINERVA [ 267 ], and PredHS [ 268 ].…”
Section: Emerging In Silico Approaches For Ppi Drug Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These physicochemical features also correlate well with distinct geometric aspects of PPI binding sites, such as residue buriedness, side chain protrusion, and surface curvature [ 258 ]. Due to the diversity exhibited by PPIs, it is difficult to rely on any individual feature for binding site and hot spot prediction, and it has repeatedly been shown that the combination of several attributes has more success in providing adequate information for PPI surfaces [ 259 ]. Knowledge-based PPI binding site and hot spot prediction algorithms are exemplified in tools like ANCHOR [ 260 ], HomPPI [ 261 ], KFC2 (Knowledge-based FADE and Contacts) [ 262 , 263 , 264 ], HotPoint [ 265 ], FTMAP [ 266 ], MINERVA [ 267 ], and PredHS [ 268 ].…”
Section: Emerging In Silico Approaches For Ppi Drug Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters can be grouped into the following types: amino acid type, evolutionary profile, conservation score, surface area, solvation energy, and geometry [81]. When using the dataset compiled by Darnell et al [100], this method had a performance of 60.4% (measured by F-Measure) that corresponded to a recall of 78.1% and a precision of 49.5% [81]. This work is significant in that it does not require the complex; it can be used with only knowledge of the monomer.…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Grosdidier and Fernández-Recio (2008) have developed an energy-based (Docking) tool with a normalized interface propensity technique. Higa and Tozzi (2009) have developed a tool based on structural and evolutionary methods with the SVM technique. Rajamani et al (2004) has developed a tool based on sidechain ΔASA (accessible surface area) with the MD technique.…”
Section: In Silico Hotspot Prediction Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%