This study focuses on morphological and molecular data analyses, misidentifications, and phylogenetic inconsistencies regarding Bradypus variegatus (the brown-throated sloth) and B. tridactylus (the pale-throated sloth). Misidentifications were recorded on 75 of 313 museum specimens of Bradypus. Almost 90% of the misidentified specimens were B. variegatus from north-central Brazil, erroneously attributed to B. tridactylus. These misidentified specimens are reported in taxonomic reviews as the southernmost records of B. tridactylus. A history of confusing nomenclature regarding sloth species exists, and these particular misidentifications could be attributable to the similarity in face and throat color between B. variegatus from north-central Brazil and B. tridactylus. The molecular phylogeny of morphologically confirmed sloth specimens exhibits 2 monophyletic lineages representing B. variegatus and B. tridactylus. The split time between these 2 lineages was estimated at 6 million years ago (mya), contradicting previous studies that estimated this divergence to be 0.4 mya. Taxonomic inconsistencies were detected when comparing the molecular phylogeny to previously published DNA sequences ascribed to B. tridactylus. Misidentification or introgression could underlie such phylogenetic incongruities. Regardless of their causes, these discrepancies lead to misstatements regarding geographic distribution, phylogeny, and taxonomy of B. variegatus and B. tridactylus. The development of molecular markers and increasing knowledge about the processes and rates of molecular change have provided remarkable tools to detect, describe, and explain biological diversity. Therefore, an ever-growing resource of DNA sequences has become available, mostly over the Internet as public databases (such as GenBank). These databases represent an important resource for studies of phylogeny, biogeography, phylogeography, conservation genetics, molecular taxonomy, genetic diversity, and intraspecific units as targets for conservation (Nikolaev et al. 2007;Ranwez et al. 2007;Thomas 2008).Beyond the basic utility and value of such databases, several issues regarding the use of these DNA data in making evolutionary, phylogenetic, or biodiversity inferences are important. Usually, molecular phylogenetic studies are concerned with the characteristics of genes and the methods used to construct trees. These aspects include homoplasy, introgression, deviation from neutrality, rate heterogeneity among taxa, confidence in estimated molecular trees, and artifacts such as long-branch attraction. However, elementary attributes such as the correct identification of specimens also warrant careful consideration (Hawksworth 2004;Vilgalys 2003). The most frequent taxonomic errors occur in those groups of organisms where identification is particularly challenging, because of the small size of the species involved, morphological similarity among them, or lack of adequate tools for identification. These issues are common for species of fungi, insects, nematodes, a...