2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572006000100030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical evaluation of the effect of population size and phenotypic measurement on QTL detection and localization using a large F2 murine mapping population

Abstract: Population size and phenotypic measurement are two key factors determining the detection power of quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. We evaluated how these two controllable factors quantitatively affect the detection of QTL and their localization using a large F2 murine mapping population and found that three main points emerged from this study. One finding was that the sensitivity of QTL detection significantly decreased as the population size decreased. The decrease in the percentage logarithm of the odd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An attempt was made to produce at least 300 F 2 offspring from these F 1 matings. This sample size was expected to be a reasonable compromise between the labor-intensive difficulties associated with the phenotyping process (see below) and the achievement of an acceptable level of statistical power for the detection of QTL (18). With a sample size of 300, the statistical power to detect a QTL that contributes 5% of the total variation in a trait is 0.98 if its effects are entirely additive or 0.90 if there is complete dominance (22).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attempt was made to produce at least 300 F 2 offspring from these F 1 matings. This sample size was expected to be a reasonable compromise between the labor-intensive difficulties associated with the phenotyping process (see below) and the achievement of an acceptable level of statistical power for the detection of QTL (18). With a sample size of 300, the statistical power to detect a QTL that contributes 5% of the total variation in a trait is 0.98 if its effects are entirely additive or 0.90 if there is complete dominance (22).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where VP1 and VP2 are the variances of the isogenic parental strains and VF1 and VF2 are the variances of the F1 and F2 offspring (25,35).…”
Section: Massett Unpublished Observations)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obviate this limitation, the map resolution and hence QTL detection power, were improved by integrating the two BC2 maps. Other factors, such as the phenotypic measurement accuracy and marker density, also contributed to the QTL detection and localization [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%