2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572002000300011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for extraction of genomic DNA from swine solid tissues

Abstract: Molecular diagnostics are performed by using DNA from different body tissues. However, it is necessary to obtain genomic DNA of good quality. Due to the impossibility of collecting blood from slaughtered animals, DNA extraction from solid tissues is necessary. The objective of this study was to describe a protocol of DNA extraction from swine skin, adipose, brain, liver, kidney and muscle tissues. We obtained high molecular weight DNA of good quality, shown by agarose gel and amplification of two DNA fragments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although milk is animal friendly and a routine source in the dairy industry (D'Angelo et al, 2007), inhibitors in milk such as fats and proteins render it difficult source for extracting high quantity and quality DNA (Lipkin et al, 1993;Amills et al, 1997;Murphy et al, 2002;Feligini et al, 2005;Cremonesi et al, 2006). To date, different commercial kits for improved DNA extraction are available for many kinds of tissues except for milk (Biase et al, 2002;Studer et al, 2008;O'Grady et al, 2008;Gao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although milk is animal friendly and a routine source in the dairy industry (D'Angelo et al, 2007), inhibitors in milk such as fats and proteins render it difficult source for extracting high quantity and quality DNA (Lipkin et al, 1993;Amills et al, 1997;Murphy et al, 2002;Feligini et al, 2005;Cremonesi et al, 2006). To date, different commercial kits for improved DNA extraction are available for many kinds of tissues except for milk (Biase et al, 2002;Studer et al, 2008;O'Grady et al, 2008;Gao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first challenge is the reduction of secondary chemical reactions (including oxidation) in the initial crude tissue extract, which otherwise could lead to loss of DNA yield; another is the lack of a universal extraction protocol suitable for different organisms because of the differences in compounds between them (Kotchomo and Gachomo, 2009). Previously, genomic DNA purification methods included phenol-chloroform-based approaches, with a popular method described by Sambrook et al (1989), using Chelex-100 (Walsh et al, 1991;Roberge et al, 1997;Yue and Orban, 2005) and methods based on grinding tissue in liquid nitrogen (Biase et al, 2002). These methods have been used effectively, but are time-consuming, accrue a storage and handling cost, and use hazardous reagents that require special handling and disposal mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suspension was incubated at 55°C for 3 hours. For precipitation of undissolved debris and proteins, 300 μl of 6 M NaCl was added to the suspension and kept at 4°C for 15 min, prior to centrifugation at 13,000 g for 15 min, after which the supernatants were transferred to new Eppendorf tubes (Biase et al, 2002). Then, the samples were extracted with phenolchloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%