2000
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572000000400050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant polytene chromosomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(70 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47, 2004 Endoreplicated and diploid interphase nuclei displayed a similar number of chromocentres, which were much larger in the endoreplicated nuclei, suggesting that the heterochromatic blocks of the endoreplicated chromatids remained very close together. Such a structure, typical of polytenic chromosomes, is reported here in plant holocentric chromosomes for the first time (see Carvalheira 2000). In plant polytenics with monocentric chromosomes, as well as in Drosophila polytenics, the large endochromocentres are associated with the pericentromeric heterochromatin, as in Phaseolus species (Carvalheira and Guerra 1998), but in the present investigation, they seemed to be associated because of the general sticky property of heterochromatin (Pedrosa et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…47, 2004 Endoreplicated and diploid interphase nuclei displayed a similar number of chromocentres, which were much larger in the endoreplicated nuclei, suggesting that the heterochromatic blocks of the endoreplicated chromatids remained very close together. Such a structure, typical of polytenic chromosomes, is reported here in plant holocentric chromosomes for the first time (see Carvalheira 2000). In plant polytenics with monocentric chromosomes, as well as in Drosophila polytenics, the large endochromocentres are associated with the pericentromeric heterochromatin, as in Phaseolus species (Carvalheira and Guerra 1998), but in the present investigation, they seemed to be associated because of the general sticky property of heterochromatin (Pedrosa et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…As the method does not require any uniform fluorescence intensity quantification, microscopic parameters could be set for each nucleus for optimal fluorescence recovery. Image acquisition was performed on hybridized slides with confocal laser scanning microscopy as Z-series Figures S2 and S3), such a distribution strongly suggests that each hybridization dot corresponds to a single chromatid, and that sister chromatids remain attached during endoreduplication which leads to the generation of polytenic chromosomes (Zybina and Zybina, 1996;Carvalheira, 2000;Joubè s and Chevalier, 2000;Edgar and Orr-Weaver, 2001;Bourdon et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between a normal mitotic cycle and endoreduplication cycle is that during the cell differentiation, no mitosis occurs (Barow 2006;Barow & Jovtchev 2007). Under certain conditions, a cell can switch itself from the mitotic mode to the endoreduplication mode (Carvalheira 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%