2000
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572000000400036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome analysis of Mexican flora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The karyotype features examined are useful to distinguish among the taxa studied. Chromosome structure and ploidy status as well as the interspecifi c variation of karyotypes (cytotypes) provide indicators of the genetic similarity between populations or species (Palomino, 2000), but caution should be applied in the interpretation of the results. As Hipp et al (2010) have noticed for Carex, different chromosome rearrangements not necessarily represent monophyletic 'races' or infraspecies, in spite that karyotype evolution is a potential player in the speciation in that genus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The karyotype features examined are useful to distinguish among the taxa studied. Chromosome structure and ploidy status as well as the interspecifi c variation of karyotypes (cytotypes) provide indicators of the genetic similarity between populations or species (Palomino, 2000), but caution should be applied in the interpretation of the results. As Hipp et al (2010) have noticed for Carex, different chromosome rearrangements not necessarily represent monophyletic 'races' or infraspecies, in spite that karyotype evolution is a potential player in the speciation in that genus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of karyological data in taxonomy, traditionally referred to as cytotaxonomy or karyosystematics, contribu-tes to evaluate the genetic relationships among species or populations and to a better understanding of the way they diverged from each other (Guerra, 2008). The importance of cytogenetical studies to contribute to the knowledge of Mexican plants has been addressed by Palomino (2000). Some examples of karyotypical and cytogenetical analyses of Mexican plants are those of Flores-Maya et al (2010), Martínez and Palomino (1996), Mercado et al (1989), Mercado-Ruaro y Delgado-Salinas (1998, 2000, Palomino and Heras (2001), Tapia-Pastrana and Gómez-Acevedo (2005), Tapia-Pastrana (2010), Tapia-Pastrana and Jiménez-Salazar (2011), and Tapia-Pastrana et al (2004, 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common applications of flow cytometry in plants are the determination of genome size, polyploidy, and endopolyploidy [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The C-value for approximately 10,770 angiosperms was estimated and is frequently used in systematics and plant improvement studies [ 22 , 33 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. It is reported as an interspecific variation of 2378 times the C-value of DNA in plants when comparing the lowest and the highest values [ 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, hasta la fecha no hay estudios que muestren la variación en los números cromosómicos para alguna flora o hábitat en particular. La información es relevante como apoyo en investigaciones sobre evolución y diversificación en floras y hábitats, y para desarrollar y establecer estrategias adecuadas para la conservación (Kenton, 1986;Martínez y Parker, 1995;Palomino, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified