2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-43662012000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Produção da ervilha cultivada em ambiente protegido sob diferentes tensões de água no solo

Abstract: R ESU M OOs efeitos de diferentes tensões de água no solo aplicadas em dois estádios fenológicos da cultura da ervilha (Pisum sativum L.) foram avaliados por meio de dois experimentos, ambos conduzidos em delineamento experimental inteiramente casualizado com quatro tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos se constituíram de quatro diferentes tensões de água no solo: 15, 30, 60 e 120 kPa. Os resultados permitiram concluir que diferenças significativas foram encontradas para produção total da planta, núm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The plot sizes used by Cardoso et al (2012); Santos, Cunha, Taira, Souza, and Leal (2018); Singh et al (2019);and Zhang et al (2016) ranged from 10 to 420 plants per plot, which were higher than those obtained in the present study, thus indicating greater reliability in the published information. However, Carvalho, Rezende, Aquino, Freitas, and Oliveira (2012); Garcia, Ferreira, Figueiredo, and Santos (2010); Mahieu et al (2009); and Oliveira, Carvalho, Rezende, and Freitas (2011) used a plot size ranging from one to six plants; these values are below what was estimated in the present study and may have led to less experimental precision in these works.…”
Section: Plot Sizecontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plot sizes used by Cardoso et al (2012); Santos, Cunha, Taira, Souza, and Leal (2018); Singh et al (2019);and Zhang et al (2016) ranged from 10 to 420 plants per plot, which were higher than those obtained in the present study, thus indicating greater reliability in the published information. However, Carvalho, Rezende, Aquino, Freitas, and Oliveira (2012); Garcia, Ferreira, Figueiredo, and Santos (2010); Mahieu et al (2009); and Oliveira, Carvalho, Rezende, and Freitas (2011) used a plot size ranging from one to six plants; these values are below what was estimated in the present study and may have led to less experimental precision in these works.…”
Section: Plot Sizecontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…In studies with pea culture, several studies were found using different sample sizes ranging from 1 to 25 plants sampled (Carvalho et al., 2012; Mahieu et al., 2009; Oliveira et al., 2011; Roro et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016), which causes a variation in experimental precision. For pea culture, eight plants are indicated in the direction of the line for the assessment of NPP and MPP with D % equal to 20% of the average for the grouped crops; that is, for the variable NPP, it is necessary carry out the census of all of the plot (100% of the plot), whereas for the variable MPP the sampling must be carried out for 88.8% of the total plot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para as reposições hídricas de 50, 75 e 100% não observou-se diferença significativa entre as formulações utilizada no experimento. Carvalho et al (2012) verificaram que os níveis de tensão de água no solo (15, 30, 60 e 120 kPa) influenciam significativamente na produção total por planta, número de vagens por planta e no peso médio por vagem.…”
Section: A Bunclassified
“…Apesar de ser adaptada a climas frios, a cultura não tolera geadas e apresenta bom desenvolvimento em temperaturas entre 13 e 18 ºC. Além disso, requer pouca necessidade de chuva e os melhores solos para seu plantio são os argilo-arenosos, férteis, com pH entre 5,9 e 6,8 e que apresentam boa aeração e drenagem (Carvalho et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified