Use and misuse of the concepts of tradition and property rights in the conservation of natural resources in the atlantic forest (Brazil)

Abstract

The relationship between resource management, local populations, and property regimes has long puzzled researchers and policy-makers. The constant failure of conservation policy reliant upon privatization and statization, has led both policy makers and researchers to recognize the importance of customary practices to achieve conservation. Yet, the overemphasis on "traditional populations" and "collective property regimes" as the way to promote conservation can be misleading. In this paper, we discuss the debate on local populations and resource conservation in the Southeastern Atlantic Forest, Brazil. The analysis focuses on 1) the concept of traditional populations; 2) the complexity of overlapping property regimes; 3) the potential for a loose relationship between "traditional populations" and "collective property regimes," and; 4) the implications of this approach for "non-traditional populations." We conclude that the bias toward "tradition" and "collective property regimes" threatens the entire range of local communities along what might be called a traditional-non-traditional populations gradient.

Does Pastoralists' Participation in the Management of National Parks in Northern Norway Contribute to Adaptive Governance?

“…Norway's approach to implementing the "new conservation paradigm" (IUCN 2003, Bushell andEagles 2007) aims to increase local participation in conservation processes (Castro et al 2006, Bay-Larsen 2010 and stimulate the sustainable use of protected areas. This involves both pasturing and the promotion of increased nature-based tourism in protected areas (St.prp.…”

Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway

“…The 20th Century reliance in traditional, hierarchical management to secure biodiversity has gained strong criticism (Castro et al 2006;Zimmerer 2006;Zachrisson 2009). As of today, there is a trend towards decentralization of management rights to communities and the public (Borrini-Feyerabend et al 2008;Dudley 2008;Fedreheim 2013;Hongslo et al 2016).…”

Quilombolas as “Green Collectives”: Contesting and Incorporating Environmentalism in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil

“…For some communities, the immediate result of these changes has been a complex process of internal rethinking of identity, values, and social practices to conform to the opportunities opened by a legally endowed quilombola identity, and thus, rights to land. In 2000, the Brazilian Congress passed the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) Law, which has provided a framework for the establishment of protected areas allowing the presence of communities considered traditional including quilombolas, caiçaras 2 and other groups (CASTRO et al, 2006). The underlying assumption, however, is that activities such as ethnic and ecological tourism, low-intensity subsistence practices, and management of non-timber forest products can create enough income to foster positive links between local communities and nature conservation.…”

“…To claim recognition and territorial rights, quilombolas have both progressively embodied and also contested a romanticized environmental identity associated with sustainability (CASTRO et al, 2006;KOHLER and BRONDIZIO 2016), but not always reflective of local conditions and expectations.…”