Tradução, adaptação cultural e validação do "American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale"

Abstract

SUMMARYBackground: The use of outcome assessment scales in scien-

Tríplice artrodese na paralisia cerebral

“…The AOFAS scale was used in the evaluation of results. 19 This score was categorized according to the following criterion: Excellent = 90 to 100 points; Good = 80 to 89; Regular = 70 to 79; Poor = below 69.…”

“…Furthermore, the severity of the deformities must have influenced our results. In the result obtained in the AOFAS 19 scale score, and the result of the score of the scale according to the clinical result, there was a difference of 18.2% in relation to the poor result, 21.2% in relation to the regular result; the good result with excellent added to good by the AOFAS scale were similar, in the total 33 analyzed cases, as demonstrated in the Kappa test = 0.337, but the degree of concordance between the two evaluations was low, therefore we cannot completely substitute the result by the AOFAS scale, as shown by Table 10, and the percentage difference between the two criteria, probably, as it does not analyze the subjective result as degree of satisfaction, which in the study, 85.3% of the patients declared they were satisfied with the procedure at the time of the evaluation, like the arch support that we obtained in 88.2% of the cases. It cannot be affirmed that the AOFAS scale is an excellent method for evaluation of patients with CP submitted to triple arthrodesis as, in the functional item, with a value of (50 points), the dysfunction is not located in the feet alone, and the patients with neuromuscular diseases present complex impairment of the neuromusculoskeletal system.…”

“…A subsequent evaluation in the same service was carried out by Fucs et al 18 with the same surgical technique, and found that among the 18 patients (21 feet) with planovalgus and equinus-varus deformities operated between May 1985 and September 1995, 72% of satisfactory results were obtained. This study aims to assess the long-term results of triple arthrodesis in patients with CP operated between 1985 and 2005 in relation to the physical examination, AOFAS (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, 1994) scale 19 and radiographic measurement of varus and valgus angles, comparing the pre-and postoperative periods.…”

Medidas de avaliação de qualidade de vida e estados de saúde em ortopedia

“…Western Ontario Específico-Avaliação funcional em osteoatrose de McMaster Arthritis articulação quadril e joelho Index (WOMAC) (33) Lysholm Scale (34) (27) Disabilities of Arm, Específico -Capacidade funcional nas Shoulder and Hand extremidades enfermidades do membro superior (DASH) (28) Western Ontario Rotator Específico -Qualidade de vida nas enfermidades Cuff Index (WORC) (1) doença do manguito rotador Athletic Shoulder Específico -Escala para avaliação das afecções do Outcome Rating Scale (29) articulação ombro em atletas Oswestry Disabilty Específico -Capacidade funcional em pacientes Index (30) doença com lombalgia…”

“…Western Ontario Específico -Avaliação funcional em osteoartrose McMaster Arthritis articulação de quadril e joelho Index (WOMAC) (32) Lysholm Scale (33) Específico -Avaliação de enfermidades doença ligamentares de joelho American Orthopaedic Específico -Escala de avaliação para Foot and Ankle Society articulação tornozelo e pé Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS) (34) …”