2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-41522016123972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito da vegetação em sistemas alagados construídos para tratar águas residuárias da suinocultura

Abstract: RESUMONo presente trabalho, objetivou-se avaliar a influência da vegetação em sistemas alagados construídos (SACs) na remoção de poluentes da água residuária da suinocultura (ARS Artigo TécnicoEfeito da vegetação em sistemas alagados construídos para tratar águas residuárias da suinocultura Keywords: pig manure; wetlands; cattail; bermudagrass. Effect of vegetation in constructed wetlands treating swine wastewater INTRODUÇÃOA suinocultura é uma atividade pecuária que se expandiu muito nas últimas décadas, por… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the results encountered in the present study, Fia et al (2017) observed no significant difference in TP removal in cultivated and uncultured CWs. Mendonça et al (2012) also obtained no significant difference between cultivated and uncultivated HSSF-CWs for the removal of phosphorus, finding mean removal efficiencies of 33.6% (HSSF-CW filled with gravel and cultivated with cattail), 28.8% (HSSF-CW filled with gravel and cultivated with marsh lily), 34.3% (HSSF-CW filled with a mixture of sand + gravel and cultured with cattail), 34.2% (HSSF-CW filled with a mixture of sand + gravel and cultivated with marsh lily) and 18.6% (HSSF-CW filled with a mixture of sand + gravel and without vegetation).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different from the results encountered in the present study, Fia et al (2017) observed no significant difference in TP removal in cultivated and uncultured CWs. Mendonça et al (2012) also obtained no significant difference between cultivated and uncultivated HSSF-CWs for the removal of phosphorus, finding mean removal efficiencies of 33.6% (HSSF-CW filled with gravel and cultivated with cattail), 28.8% (HSSF-CW filled with gravel and cultivated with marsh lily), 34.3% (HSSF-CW filled with a mixture of sand + gravel and cultured with cattail), 34.2% (HSSF-CW filled with a mixture of sand + gravel and cultivated with marsh lily) and 18.6% (HSSF-CW filled with a mixture of sand + gravel and without vegetation).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows that there was no difference in K removal between cultivated and uncultured HSSF-CWs. Fia et al (2017) evaluated the influence of vegetation on HSSF-CWs for the removal of pollutants from swine wastewater (SWW). The authors found no significant difference in potassium removal efficiency, with values of 27% in the three HSSF-CWs evaluated (uncultivated, cultivated with cattail and cultivated with Tifton 85 grass).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW) systems provide good conditions for nitrification, but denitrification does not occur in these systems. Thus, hybrid or combined systems, in which the advantages of each system type are combined, have been studied, allowing producing waste water with a reduced organic load and lower nitrogen concentrations (Mendonça et al, 2015;Fia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutrients NT (74.6%), PT (82.7%) and K (71.4%), the main ones for the development of agricultural crops, demonstrated the removal efficiency of the percentages found in the literature (Fia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%