2015
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-41522015020000119054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tamanho de bolhas de ar formadas por difusores não porosos na água

Abstract: RESUMONeste estudo foram realizados experimentos para investigar o tamanho de bolhas de ar formadas a partir de difusores não porosos em um tanque de água.O tamanho das bolhas individuais e o diâmetro de Sauter foram avaliados usando uma técnica de processamento de imagens. Os resultados confirmam que a vazão de ar e o diâmetro do orifício são parâmetros importantes que controlam a distribuição do tamanho das bolhas e o diâmetro de Sauter.Análise dimensional é realizada para fornecer uma relação adimensional g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The air flow rates per orifice were similar to those of Lima Neto et al (2008), in which bubbles with diameters ranging from about 6 to 8 mm were formed. This agrees well with the values of 6.6-8.1 mm estimated from the correlation given by Lima Neto (2015). For such bubble sizes and the above air flow rate/water depth conditions, the effect of gas-liquid mass transfer on bubble plume hydrodynamics is expected to be negligible (see Lima Neto and Parente, 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The air flow rates per orifice were similar to those of Lima Neto et al (2008), in which bubbles with diameters ranging from about 6 to 8 mm were formed. This agrees well with the values of 6.6-8.1 mm estimated from the correlation given by Lima Neto (2015). For such bubble sizes and the above air flow rate/water depth conditions, the effect of gas-liquid mass transfer on bubble plume hydrodynamics is expected to be negligible (see Lima Neto and Parente, 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%