Desenvolvimento marsupial e ciclo de vida de Cymothoa liannae Sartor &amp; Pires (Isopoda, Cymothoidae), parasita de peixes

Sartor, Silvia Maria

doi:10.1590/s0373-55241987000100006

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…; mouth; marine; Rio de Janeiro (Thatcher et al 2003b). Cymothoa liannae Sartor and Pires, 1988 Chloroscombrus chrysurus; mouth; marine; Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, São Paulo (Sartor 1987;Sartor and Pires 1988;Pires-Vanin 1998;Thatcher et al 2003b Cavalcanti et al 2011). Cymothoa sp.…”

Section: Cymothoa Excisa Perty 1833mentioning

confidence: 99%

Checklist of Crustacea parasitizing fishes from Brazil

Luque¹,

Vieira²,

Takemoto³

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Materials and MethodsThe list of parasitic crustaceans of fishes in Brazil was based on extensive search of published records. This bibliographic review of the crustacean species reported from fishes in Brazilian waters was complemented with information from the Zoological Record, Biological Abstracts, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts, Biological and Agricultural Index Plus and the Scopus. Data were compiled until March, 2013. In the case of parasitic copepods, only information not presented in the checklist of Copepoda parasites of fishes from Brazil by Luque and Tavares (2007) was included. The number of parasitic associations was calculated from the sum of the richness of species of parasites on each host species.The checklist follows the classification and systematic arrangement proposed by Boxshall and Halsey (2004) for Copepoda, and Young (1998) and Martin and Davis (2001) for other crustacean groups.The species of crustaceans are arranged according to taxonomic categories, within which the species are presented in alphabetical order, followed by hosts (specific name), site of infection, habitat, localities and references (between parentheses, in chronological order). In addition, the checklist also includes crustacean species identified only at the genus level and undetermined species. Crustacean names presented in the checklist follow the most recent taxonomic literature, but validity of individual taxa or reliability of their records was not critically examined by the present authors. Host species were arranged in taxonomic and then alphabetical order.The key to identification of the genera of parasitic crustaceans from fishes in Brazil has been produced on the basis of those by Delaney

show abstract

Section: Cymothoa Excisa Perty 1833mentioning

confidence: 99%

Checklist of Crustacea parasitizing fishes from Brazil

Luque¹,

Vieira²,

Takemoto³

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These are the first detailed photographic images embryonic stages of Cymothoidae and the first images of embryos of the groups Ceratothoa and Elthusa. Only a few previous publications provided an illustration of one or more embryonic or marsupial stages of Cymothoidae: a developing embryo of Nerocila californica (see Brusca, 1978b); an embryo of Cymothoa liannae; a 'pre-hatch' of Anilocra pomacentri (see Adlard & Lester, 1995); an embryo of an unidentified Amazonian representative of Cymothoiiae (see Sartor, 1987); a Glossobius hemiramphii embryo see (Bakenhaster, McBride & Price, 2006); and an embryo of Cymothoa frontalis (see Aneesh et al, 2015). Aneesh et al (2016) and Aneesh et al (2018) both provided a photo of the embryos of Mothocya renardi and Agarna malayi, respectively.…”

Section: New Data On Embryosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shape of attachment structures in parasitic isopodan crustaceans: the influence of attachment site and ontogeny

Wal

Haug

2020

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many fields of modern systematic biology are adult-centred. This is unfortunately also the case for Cymothoidae, an ingroup of parasitic forms of Isopoda, with fishes as hosts. Different ingroups of Cymothoidae have specialised appendages that enable their fish associated lifestyles, attaching to different sites on the body of the host. The extent to which these structures vary among species and in relation different sites of attachment, and between different ontogenetic stages, is explored here. This study presents the detailed descriptions, illustrations, comparisons, and analysis of a variety of attachment structures of 13 adult and immature specimens representing three major groups Ceratothoa, Elthusa and Anilocra, along with full focus, detailed photographs of all the examined life stages. The three groups exhibit different strategies attaching to mouth, gill and externally, respectively. A statistical representation of the morphology of the dactyli, used for attaching to the host, was performed. This included a critical comparison of 10 additional species documented in literature. This is the first comprehensive description and photographs of specialised appendage morphology of immatures of Ceratothoa, as well as the first detailed micrographs of embryonic stages of Cymothoidae, and the first lateral and ventral views of immature stages of the examined species. Immature specimens possess morphological characters that can be used to distinguish between different species, but cannot be accurately identified based on diagnostic characters of adults. Quantitative analysis indicates that ontogeny plays a major role in the shape of the attachment structures (e.g. dactyli).

show abstract

“…In their infectious stage "mancae," as well-developed larvae are known, can survive for several days without finding a host, and have large eyes and long setae on their pleopods (swimming-appendages) that aid swimming dispersal to new host individuals (Araújo, 2008;Costa & Chellappa, 2010;Sartor, 1987;Thatcher, 2000;Williams & Bunkley- Williams, 2019). However, setae are molted by adults, and eyes are generally reduced, limiting the ability to locate other host individuals in the event of being dislodged.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Habitat and host associations of the fish‐burrowing parasite Artystone minima (Cymothoidae: Isopoda) in eastern Amazonia

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cymothoid fish parasites settle on hosts in ways that may impact fish health and energetics. High abundances of Artystone minima observed in Nannostomus beckfordi from the Jeju River in eastern Amazonia were investigated to answer the following questions: (a) What factors are associated with the high prevalence at this locality?; (b) Is high abundance associated with co‐infestation of alternative hosts?; and (c) Is parasite presence associated with host species growth and/or reproduction? Fish assemblages were sampled quarterly (August 2017–May 2018) from five habitats along with environmental data. Parasitic indices were calculated, and parasite presence used to evaluate differences in growth of hosts using analysis of covariance considering host sex and sampling season (wet vs. dry). Parasites were only abundant in one of the habitats, a large, shallow backwater bay with macrophytes. Abiotic environmental factors (flow and depth) likely impact parasite transmission and are, therefore, particularly important in producing these local patterns. Two secondary hosts, Hyphessobrycon cf. rosaceus and Moenkhausia collettii, were found in the wet season. Based on host biology compared to other fish in the habitat, parasite infestation is inferred to be depth associated and long‐term infestation is apparently limited in alternative hosts. Parasite presence was significantly associated with reduced weight (standardized for length) of female Nannostomus beckfordi in the wet season. Furthermore, ovaries of non‐parasitized females from the wet season presented a range of maturation stages, while parasitized females were all immature, indicating a significant association of parasites with host reproductive capacity. Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material

show abstract

Desenvolvimento marsupial e ciclo de vida de Cymothoa liannae Sartor & Pires (Isopoda, Cymothoidae), parasita de peixes

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

Checklist of Crustacea parasitizing fishes from Brazil

Checklist of Crustacea parasitizing fishes from Brazil

Shape of attachment structures in parasitic isopodan crustaceans: the influence of attachment site and ontogeny

Habitat and host associations of the fish‐burrowing parasite Artystone minima (Cymothoidae: Isopoda) in eastern Amazonia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About