Abstract:Esse trabalho estuda a redução do MnO por banhos de ferro saturado em carbono, nas temperaturas de 1500°C, 1550°C e 1600°C. São determinados os valores da energia de ativação aparente para essa reação, através do método das velocidades iniciais, para teores de manganês iniciais no banho de 0%, 10% e 40%. Os valores encontrados foram, respectivamente, 64,8 kcal/mol, 63,13 kcal/mol e 63,25 kcal/mol . The objective of this work was to investigate the effect of temperature on the velocity of MnO red… Show more
“…Apparent rate constant values from these studies as displayed in Table 5 and Figure 3 illustrate this point as well. The highest values are those for graphite dissolution in manganese containing alloys (de Oliveira et al, 1999).…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…From the rate values of de Oliveira et al (1999) as illustrated in Table 3 it is seen that the carbon dissolution rate is two orders of magnitude larger than the reduction rate from carbon dissolved in the alloy. Therefore, given similar reaction interface area values for these two reactions, the alloy bath should stay saturated even if MnO reduction from dissolved alloy carbon takes place.…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…de Oliveira et al (1999) measured the rate of graphite carbon dissolution into iron containing 5%Mn and 15%Mn, respectively and 0%C initially, at 1600°C in an induction furnace and under argon gas atmosphere. The authors assumed mass transfer control for the carbon dissolution reaction and found that the mass transfer equation described their alloy bath carbon content measurements well.…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that the rate of carbon dissolution into Fe-Mn alloys is faster than the rate of reduction of MnO by carbon saturated Fe-Mn alloy. The initial rates of carbon dissolution and MnO reduction from de Oliveira et al (1999) were reworked to comparable units as illustrated in Table 3 by using the stated alloy volume (38.22cm 3 ) and alloy-graphite crucible contact area (25.64cm 2 ) in the carbon dissolution experiments with Fe-Mn alloy density data from Lee et al (2011). Skjervheim and Olsen (1995) showed that mechanical stirring of the slag and alloy (carbon saturated manganese) did not affect the MnO reduction rate, and therefore diffusion is not the rate controlling step in this reaction system.…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative importance of reactions at the bath-heap interface was investigated by calculating the expected carbon dissolution rate from equation ( 6), using rate constant values from literature. Rate constant values for graphite dissolution were taken from the work of de Oliveira et al (1999) for dissolution into 5%Mn-Fe alloy at 1600°C and from the work of Jang et al (2012) for dissolution into pure iron at 1550°C. The rate constant for the slowest coal carbon dissolution rate into Fe-2%C-0.02%S alloy was taken from the study by Wu and Sahajwalla (2000).…”
Section: The Effect Of Carbon Dissolution Into the Alloy Bathmentioning
“…Apparent rate constant values from these studies as displayed in Table 5 and Figure 3 illustrate this point as well. The highest values are those for graphite dissolution in manganese containing alloys (de Oliveira et al, 1999).…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…From the rate values of de Oliveira et al (1999) as illustrated in Table 3 it is seen that the carbon dissolution rate is two orders of magnitude larger than the reduction rate from carbon dissolved in the alloy. Therefore, given similar reaction interface area values for these two reactions, the alloy bath should stay saturated even if MnO reduction from dissolved alloy carbon takes place.…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…de Oliveira et al (1999) measured the rate of graphite carbon dissolution into iron containing 5%Mn and 15%Mn, respectively and 0%C initially, at 1600°C in an induction furnace and under argon gas atmosphere. The authors assumed mass transfer control for the carbon dissolution reaction and found that the mass transfer equation described their alloy bath carbon content measurements well.…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that the rate of carbon dissolution into Fe-Mn alloys is faster than the rate of reduction of MnO by carbon saturated Fe-Mn alloy. The initial rates of carbon dissolution and MnO reduction from de Oliveira et al (1999) were reworked to comparable units as illustrated in Table 3 by using the stated alloy volume (38.22cm 3 ) and alloy-graphite crucible contact area (25.64cm 2 ) in the carbon dissolution experiments with Fe-Mn alloy density data from Lee et al (2011). Skjervheim and Olsen (1995) showed that mechanical stirring of the slag and alloy (carbon saturated manganese) did not affect the MnO reduction rate, and therefore diffusion is not the rate controlling step in this reaction system.…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative importance of reactions at the bath-heap interface was investigated by calculating the expected carbon dissolution rate from equation ( 6), using rate constant values from literature. Rate constant values for graphite dissolution were taken from the work of de Oliveira et al (1999) for dissolution into 5%Mn-Fe alloy at 1600°C and from the work of Jang et al (2012) for dissolution into pure iron at 1550°C. The rate constant for the slowest coal carbon dissolution rate into Fe-2%C-0.02%S alloy was taken from the study by Wu and Sahajwalla (2000).…”
Section: The Effect Of Carbon Dissolution Into the Alloy Bathmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.