2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0366-69132011000100013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caracterização microestrutural de materiais cerâmicos utilizando o programa de processamento digital de imagens Image J

Abstract: ResumoNeste trabalho foram quantifi cados o tamanho de grão e a porosidade de uma amostra de zircônia estabilizada com ítria (ZEI) sinterizada a 1500 °C/ 2 h e a fração volumétrica das fases ZEI, NiO e poros de um compósito de ZEI/NiO sinterizado a 1500 °C/ 2 h. Utilizando o programa de análise de imagens ImageJ foi possível tratar as imagens removendo ruídos e evidenciando as regiões de interesse de análise. Após as imagens serem analisadas, foi feito o tratamento estatístico dos dados como sugerido nas norma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At 800 °C the electrical conductivity is around 30% higher for the ZnO co-doped samples. Using ImageJ 17 , it was measured an average grain size of 0.7 ± 0.2 µm in the TZ8Y+ 0.5 wt% ZnO sample sintered at 1300 °C/ 2 h and an average grain size of 1.6± 0.3 µm in the reference TZ8Y sample sintered at 1400 °C/ 2 h. Since both samples have similar porosity and similar grain size, i.e., similar microstructural features, it is expected that this difference in electrical conductivity is not due to microstructural differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 800 °C the electrical conductivity is around 30% higher for the ZnO co-doped samples. Using ImageJ 17 , it was measured an average grain size of 0.7 ± 0.2 µm in the TZ8Y+ 0.5 wt% ZnO sample sintered at 1300 °C/ 2 h and an average grain size of 1.6± 0.3 µm in the reference TZ8Y sample sintered at 1400 °C/ 2 h. Since both samples have similar porosity and similar grain size, i.e., similar microstructural features, it is expected that this difference in electrical conductivity is not due to microstructural differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polished samples were analyzed by SEM coupled with EDS. Quantitative image analysis was performed using ImageJ (National Institute of Health) 17 .…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean diameter and mean porosity area of the fibers was measured using ImageJ 6.0 software. Data were obtained for 70 fibers and expressed as mean ± standard deviation …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As análises morfológicas e as razões de cálcio/fósforo (Ca/P) foram verificadas por meio da microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV) e da espectroscopia de energia dispersiva de raios X (EDX) com o equipamento TESCAN, modelo VEGA3 com um EDX acoplado. Para a quantificação do tamanho médio dos grãos utilizou-se o programa computacional ImageJ, software de domínio público com código aberto, desenvolvido pelo National Institute of Health (NIH), Estados Unidos [29].…”
Section: Caracterizaçãounclassified