2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-93132012000100013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[No Title Available]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this perspective, we distinguish within the material design practices at the intersection with biology a specific pathway that we can define as "bio-digital fabrication" or "digital biofabrication," which is different from other practices based on the use of living matter. In particular, we can distinguish four macro-fields (Collet, 2013;Camere and Karana, 2017) that also correspond to a more general difference of biofabrication from other living matter-based technological platforms (Mironov et al, 2009): i) "growing design," that matches with biomanufacturing and refers to the possibility to produce sustainable materials and biomolecules harnessing living matter as a raw material through making, crafting and tangible practices; ii) "augmented biology," that matches synthetic biology and refers to the synthesis of new biological entities and materials from genome engineering; iii) "bio-digital fabrication," that complies with biofabrication and stretches the possibilities of biological manipulation adopting computational tools, digital advanced manufacturing technologies and mathematical modeling tools involving nature as object of design processes; iv) "biodesign fiction," which does not properly focus on the productive paradigms of the present, but imagines-often with conceptual visions-far provocative futures for advanced biotechnological developments.…”
Section: The Legacy Of Biological Fabrication: New Material-based Bio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, we distinguish within the material design practices at the intersection with biology a specific pathway that we can define as "bio-digital fabrication" or "digital biofabrication," which is different from other practices based on the use of living matter. In particular, we can distinguish four macro-fields (Collet, 2013;Camere and Karana, 2017) that also correspond to a more general difference of biofabrication from other living matter-based technological platforms (Mironov et al, 2009): i) "growing design," that matches with biomanufacturing and refers to the possibility to produce sustainable materials and biomolecules harnessing living matter as a raw material through making, crafting and tangible practices; ii) "augmented biology," that matches synthetic biology and refers to the synthesis of new biological entities and materials from genome engineering; iii) "bio-digital fabrication," that complies with biofabrication and stretches the possibilities of biological manipulation adopting computational tools, digital advanced manufacturing technologies and mathematical modeling tools involving nature as object of design processes; iv) "biodesign fiction," which does not properly focus on the productive paradigms of the present, but imagines-often with conceptual visions-far provocative futures for advanced biotechnological developments.…”
Section: The Legacy Of Biological Fabrication: New Material-based Bio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from more traditional and general-purpose compression algorithms like LZ4 [20] and LZMA [21], model quantization [22], [23] and sparsification [10], [11], [13] are also referred to as compression techniques in ML. Given that model parameters are floating point numbers, quantization aims at representing such numbers as integers with a smaller bit length.…”
Section: B Communication Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%