2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-66322013000300019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow of a Williamson fluid over a stretching sheet

Abstract: -In the present article, we have examined the two dimensional flow of Williamson fluid model over a stretching sheet. The governing equations of pseudoplastic Williamson fluid are modelled and then simplified by using similarity transformations and boundary layer approach. The reduced equations are then solved analytically with the help of homotopy analysis method. The physical features of the model are presented and discussed through graphs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
112
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to investigate the physical representation of the problem, the numerical values of velocity (f / (η)), temperature (θ(η)) and species concentration (φ (η)) with the boundary layer have been computed for different parameters as Williamson fluid parameter, We, Grashof number, Gr, modified Grashof number, Gc, Hartmann number, M, velocity ratio parameter, a/c, Prandtl number, Pr, thermal radiation, R, heat source, Q, Eckert number, Ec, Schmidt number, Sc and Soret number, So. In order to assess the accuracy of the numerical results the present results are compared with the previous studies (Fang et al, 2009;Nadeem et al, 2013;Ramzan et al, 2017;Salahuddin et al, 2016;Sher Akbar et al, 2015) presented in Tables 1-3 The velocity profile for different values of Williamson fluid parameter, We, are given in Fig. 3 which shows a decreasing trend in momentum boundary layer due to increase in We.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to investigate the physical representation of the problem, the numerical values of velocity (f / (η)), temperature (θ(η)) and species concentration (φ (η)) with the boundary layer have been computed for different parameters as Williamson fluid parameter, We, Grashof number, Gr, modified Grashof number, Gc, Hartmann number, M, velocity ratio parameter, a/c, Prandtl number, Pr, thermal radiation, R, heat source, Q, Eckert number, Ec, Schmidt number, Sc and Soret number, So. In order to assess the accuracy of the numerical results the present results are compared with the previous studies (Fang et al, 2009;Nadeem et al, 2013;Ramzan et al, 2017;Salahuddin et al, 2016;Sher Akbar et al, 2015) presented in Tables 1-3 The velocity profile for different values of Williamson fluid parameter, We, are given in Fig. 3 which shows a decreasing trend in momentum boundary layer due to increase in We.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where Π = trace(A 1 ) 2 = 2 ∂u ∂y 2 is the second invariant strain tensor derived as in [4,8]. We consider the constitutive Equation (7) in which µ ∞ = 0 and Γ .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, a number of reports exist in literature on the problem of flow over linearly stretching sheets. For example, Nadeem et al [4] examined the two dimensional flow of Williamson fluid over a stretching sheet using similarity transformations, boundary layer approach and homotopy analysis method, and observed that the velocity and skin friction decrease with the increase in the Williamson parameter. Nadeem et al [5] studied the steady flow of Casson fluid over a linearly stretching sheet in the presence of a nano-particle using similarity transformation solution and numerical approach, and observed that the Brownian and thermo-phoresic parameters reduce the Nusselt number but increase the Sherwood number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%