2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-66322006000100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bilevel decomposition technique for the optimal planning of offshore platforms

Abstract: -There is a great incentive for developing systematic approaches that effectively identify strategies for planning oilfield complexes. This paper proposes an MILP that relies on a reformulation of the model developed by Tsarbopoulou (UCL M.S. Dissertation, London, 2000). Moreover, a bilevel decomposition technique is applied to the MILP. A master problem determines the assignment of platforms to wells and a planning subproblem calculates the timing for fixed assignments. Furthermore, a heuristic search procedu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ramazan (2007) aggregate blocks, in a long-term production scheduling problem, to form 'fundamental trees' -minimal collections of blocks that have a positive total economic value, and can be extracted without violating slope constraints -significantly reducing the number of integer variables required in MIP formulations of such problems. Boland et al (2009) For pooling problems involving time, such as the scheduling of crude oil refineries (Shah 1996, Wenkai et al 2002, Màs and Pinto 2003, Reddy et al 2004, Bengtsson et al 2013 and the planning or design of oilfield infrastructure (Iyer and Grossmann 1998, van den Heever and Grossmann 2000, Carvalho and Pinto 2006, solution techniques are commonly hierarchical or decomposition-based in nature. Shah (1996) consider a crude oil scheduling problem in which oil arriving on ships is allocated into port tanks, piped into storage tanks at a refinery, and allocated to crude distillation units (CDUs) for processing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramazan (2007) aggregate blocks, in a long-term production scheduling problem, to form 'fundamental trees' -minimal collections of blocks that have a positive total economic value, and can be extracted without violating slope constraints -significantly reducing the number of integer variables required in MIP formulations of such problems. Boland et al (2009) For pooling problems involving time, such as the scheduling of crude oil refineries (Shah 1996, Wenkai et al 2002, Màs and Pinto 2003, Reddy et al 2004, Bengtsson et al 2013 and the planning or design of oilfield infrastructure (Iyer and Grossmann 1998, van den Heever and Grossmann 2000, Carvalho and Pinto 2006, solution techniques are commonly hierarchical or decomposition-based in nature. Shah (1996) consider a crude oil scheduling problem in which oil arriving on ships is allocated into port tanks, piped into storage tanks at a refinery, and allocated to crude distillation units (CDUs) for processing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, several studies attempted to achieve a decrease in solution time by reformulating previous models and upgrading the solving techniques. 11,12 After some time, two studies formulated the nonlinear behavior of reservoirs in their models that was not surveyed seriously until that time. 13,14 They also attempted to improve solving techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They linearized the nonlinear reservoir performance equations by piecewise linear approximations. After that, several studies attempted to achieve a decrease in solution time by reformulating previous models and upgrading the solving techniques. , After some time, two studies formulated the nonlinear behavior of reservoirs in their models that was not surveyed seriously until that time. , They also attempted to improve solving techniques. Later, uncertainty features were considered in the model by various researchers. ,,, Uncertainty parameters that they considered in their models were demand, crude oil recoverable amounts, crude oil price, and well productivity indices and reservoirs quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ortiz-Gomez et al (2002) presented three mixed-integer multiperiod optimization models of varying complexity for the oil production planning. Carvalho and Pinto (2006a) considered an MILP formulation for oilfield planning based on the model developed by Tsarbopoulou (2000), and proposed a bilevel decomposition algorithm for solving large-scale problems where the master problem determines the assignment of platforms to wells and a planning subproblem calculates the timing for the fixed assignments. The work was further extended by Carvalho and Pinto (2006b) to consider multiple reservoirs within the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%