1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-66321998000100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking Variable Correlation into Consideration during Parameter Estimation

Abstract: Variable correlations are usually neglected during parameter estimation. Very frequently these are gross assumptions and may potentially lead to inadequate interpretation of final estimation results. For this reason, variable correlation and model parameters are sometimes estimated simultaneously in certain parameter estimation procedures. It is shown, however, that usually taking variable correlation into consideration during parameter estimation may be inadequate and unnecessary, unless independent experimen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kinetic and adsorption constants were estimated by a least squares regression quasiNewton algorithm [33,34]. change was observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic and adsorption constants were estimated by a least squares regression quasiNewton algorithm [33,34]. change was observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,23 had shown the existence of strong correlation of kinetic parameters in mathematical models containing more than one temperature-dependent kinetic constant. Such correlation makes the task of precise estimation of different kinetic parameters more onerous 24,25 . In such cases, re-parametrized form of Arrhenius equation is known to significantly reduce computational effort by reducing the correlation between parameters 26 .…”
Section: Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21)). The parameters are correlated, thus a maximum likelihood procedure was used, the ESTIMA software (Santos and Pinto, 1998). At this step, no oscillations were considered; therefore the model described the curve inclination, and its proximity to a PFR model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%