2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-59702014000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Missão Botânica de Moçambique (1942-1948): contribuições para o conhecimento da flora medicinal de Moçambique

Abstract: O artigo revisita o espólio histórico-científico aduzido pela Missão Botânica de Moçambique (1942-1948) à guarda do Jardim Botânico Tropical do Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical (Lisboa), destacando os cadernos de campo dos seus coletores, com o objetivo de identificar os usos medicinais tradicionais da flora moçambicana. Tendo-se coligido informação relativa a 71 taxa (setenta espécies e um género), identificou-se a utilização medicinal de 34 espécies presumivelmente ainda não reportada para Moçam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, D. rotundifolia (Figure 1), traditionally used to treat diarrhea [22], is a prevailing species of dense undergrowth in the coastal area of the Marracuene District [23]. Furthermore, among the Diospyros species present in the Mozambican flora, D. villosa (Figure 2) is a species with a well-established traditional use of both leaf [24] and root [25]; the latter mainly used as a toothbrush for hygiene purposes [26]. Furthermore, among the Diospyros species present in the Mozambican flora, D. villosa (Figure 2) is a species with a well-established traditional use of both leaf [24] and root [25]; the latter mainly used as a toothbrush for hygiene purposes [26].…”
Section: Ethnomedical Use Of Diospyros Species Of Mozambican Floramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among these, D. rotundifolia (Figure 1), traditionally used to treat diarrhea [22], is a prevailing species of dense undergrowth in the coastal area of the Marracuene District [23]. Furthermore, among the Diospyros species present in the Mozambican flora, D. villosa (Figure 2) is a species with a well-established traditional use of both leaf [24] and root [25]; the latter mainly used as a toothbrush for hygiene purposes [26]. Furthermore, among the Diospyros species present in the Mozambican flora, D. villosa (Figure 2) is a species with a well-established traditional use of both leaf [24] and root [25]; the latter mainly used as a toothbrush for hygiene purposes [26].…”
Section: Ethnomedical Use Of Diospyros Species Of Mozambican Floramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, among the Diospyros species present in the Mozambican flora, D. villosa (Figure 2) is a species with a well-established traditional use of both leaf [24] and root [25]; the latter mainly used as a toothbrush for hygiene purposes [26]. Furthermore, among the Diospyros species present in the Mozambican flora, D. villosa (Figure 2) is a species with a well-established traditional use of both leaf [24] and root [25]; the latter mainly used as a toothbrush for hygiene purposes [26]. Diospyros species have been reported to be used to treat the signals and symptoms of over 20 diseases.…”
Section: Ethnomedical Use Of Diospyros Species Of Mozambican Floramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Silva (2014) states that the fact that they are natural medicines does not negate the possibility of being partially harmful. Conde et al (2014) report that the fact that medicinal plants are used empirically, without many restrictions and that most dosages are measured holistically, can be harmful to public health if they are used irrationally.…”
Section: Impact Of the Popular Use Of Boldo In Lusophone African Coun...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leprosy, eradicated in 2008 but subsequently resurged, has raised the interest of various scholars, ranging from ethnographers (Dias and Dias 1998;Junod 1996) to historians (Liesegang 1994;Roque 2016; Zamparoni 2017: 13-39), anthropologists (Palhota 2012), epidemiologists (Grau-Pujol et al 2019;Griffiths and Ready 2001;Marrega et al 2019;Silva 2007;Stuip et al 2003), and biologists/botanists (Conde et al 2014;Sitoe 2020). Overall, this literature treats leprosy from a clinical/epidemiological point of view and in the context of the medical political model of exclusion and integration.…”
Section: Studies On Health and Inequalities In Mozambiquementioning
confidence: 99%