2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-59702005000400007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning science from museums

Abstract: This article provides an overview of current understandings of the science learning that occurs as a consequence of visiting a free-choice learning setting like a science museum. The best available evidence indicates that if you want to understand learning at the level of individuals within the real world, learning does functionally differ depending upon the conditions, i. e., the context, under which it occurs. Hence, learning in museums is different than learning in any other setting. The contextual model of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
120
0
31

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
120
0
31
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of other studies have demonstrated that students value a sense of freedom and choice in their learning (see Falk & Dierking, 2000;Griffin & Symington, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of other studies have demonstrated that students value a sense of freedom and choice in their learning (see Falk & Dierking, 2000;Griffin & Symington, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest has been found to be associated with focused attention, higher cognitive functioning, and learning (Ainley, Hidi, & Berndorff, 2002), which makes it an important variable for learning in field trip settings (J. H. Falk & Dierking, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing evidence that alongside students learning and doing science, there are opportunities for socialisation and building self confidence. Indeed, many studies have highlighted the personal, socio-cultural and physical benefits associated with informal learning (for example, Falk and Dierking, 2000). Rickinson, Dillon, Tearney, Morris, Choi, Sanders and Benefield (2004) suggest that much research into outcomes of outdoor learning is descriptive rather than empirical, and that whilst useful in itself, there needs to be a more rigorous approach to exploring the benefits that might actually occur in fieldwork contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%