2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-530x2011000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abordagens para problemas de carregamento de contêineres com considerações de múltiplos destinos

Abstract: Neste trabalho, apresentamos um modelo de programação linear inteira mista 0-1 e abordagens baseadas neste modelo para tratar problemas de carregamento de caixas retangulares dentro de um contêiner ou caminhão, considerando restrições práticas de múltiplos destinos. Em particular, estamos interessados apenas no arranjo da carga dentro do caminhão, assumindo que o roteiro que este deve percorrer já é conhecido a priori e que a carga cabe dentro dele. O objetivo, portanto, é determinar o melhor padrão de empacot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a few heuristics focused on the 2L-CVPR Problem [5,6,10,16], and some heuristics for the strip packing version of the problem [4]. There is also an exact algorithm for the three dimensional version of the KU problem, based on an ILP formulation which take into account other practical constraints within the unloading constraint [14,15]. Furthermore, the recent advances in the two dimensional knapsack does not directly apply to the KU problem.…”
Section: A(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few heuristics focused on the 2L-CVPR Problem [5,6,10,16], and some heuristics for the strip packing version of the problem [4]. There is also an exact algorithm for the three dimensional version of the KU problem, based on an ILP formulation which take into account other practical constraints within the unloading constraint [14,15]. Furthermore, the recent advances in the two dimensional knapsack does not directly apply to the KU problem.…”
Section: A(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%