2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-530x2009000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Um algoritmo enumerativo baseado em ordenamento parcial para resolução do problema de minimização de trocas de ferramentas

Abstract: No problema de minimização de troca de ferramentas procura-se por uma sequência para processar um conjunto de tarefas de modo que o número requerido de trocas de ferramentas seja o menor possível. Neste trabalho propõe-se um algoritmo para resolver este problema baseado em um ordenamento parcial das tarefas. Uma sequência ótima é obtida expandindo-se as sequências parciais enumeradas. Testes computacionais são apresentados.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of the four neighborhood structures for MTSP. [19,16]). The ILS [16] does not find the optimal solution for two instances of C and one instance of E. For group D (Table 6), the CS þBRKGA found optimal solutions for 189 of 260 instances (enumeration proved optimality of only those 189 instances) while ILS [16] did not find optimal solutions for 13 of these 189 instances.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Examples of the four neighborhood structures for MTSP. [19,16]). The ILS [16] does not find the optimal solution for two instances of C and one instance of E. For group D (Table 6), the CS þBRKGA found optimal solutions for 189 of 260 instances (enumeration proved optimality of only those 189 instances) while ILS [16] did not find optimal solutions for 13 of these 189 instances.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instances of Crama et al [2] were solved by enumeration [18,19], the ILS [16], the BRKGA, and CS þBRKGA. For each problem size ðN; M; CÞ, 10 instances were generated.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations