2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-14282006000100015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propriedades mecânicas e morfologia de blendas de polipropileno com Tpes

Abstract: Blendas de polipropileno e elastômeros termoplásticos (TPEs), estireno-b-butadieno-b-estireno (SBS) e estireno-b-etileno-co-butileno-b-estireno(SEBS) foram preparadas com o objetivo de avaliar a influência do tipo e da concentração do elastômero nas propriedades mecânicas e na morfologia das blendas. Foram utilizados dois tipos de polipropileno, um homopolímero de propileno (PP-H) e um copolímero randômico de propileno-etileno (PP-R), sendo avaliado também o efeito das características da matriz termoplástica. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…63 PA6/SEBS-MA blend increased the T C to 189.9 C, indicating that 20% of SEBS-MA promoted a slight acceleration in crystallization. Similar behavior was reported in the literature, 64 suggesting that good interaction between thermoplastic elastomers and the polymer matrix can improve the crystallization process. Regarding the nanocomposites (Table 2), in general, ferrite addition had a minimal effect on the T c values compared to PA6.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…63 PA6/SEBS-MA blend increased the T C to 189.9 C, indicating that 20% of SEBS-MA promoted a slight acceleration in crystallization. Similar behavior was reported in the literature, 64 suggesting that good interaction between thermoplastic elastomers and the polymer matrix can improve the crystallization process. Regarding the nanocomposites (Table 2), in general, ferrite addition had a minimal effect on the T c values compared to PA6.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is due to factors related to the intrinsic characteristics of these organic materials, such as low density, high design flexibility, and low cost compared to metallic materials, as well as due to the possibility of being reinforced with other materials producing composites. These composites provide a series of exceptional properties, including high mechanical strength, wear, corrosion resistance, and easy fabrication, once they have relatively low processing temperatures and lower density compared to metal and ceramic materials 1–3,5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[41] In addition, as SEBS and EPDM have molecular interactions with PP, impact strength tends to increase greatly, creating tough and flexible materials. [42,43] However, SEBS has PS blocks at the ends of the chain, helping to promote a better balance between stiffness/flexibility, [44] compared to EPDM. The maleic anhydride functionalization process of SEBS and EPDM makes the molecular structure more reactive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%