2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-06182010000300002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investimento privado: uma análise empírica para o Brasil

Abstract: O presente estudo identifica os determinantes do investimento privado no Brasil para o período compreendido entre 1970 e 2005. O artigo apresenta as principais teorias de investimento, os desenvolvimentos recentes e as principais aplicações para os dados brasileiros. Os resultados indicam que aumentos na renda e na atividade econômica influenciam positivamente o investimento do setor privado no Brasil. A redução no volume de crédito e a existência de instabilidades políticas e econômicas mostraram-se prejudici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that real interest rate, a proxy for the real rental price of capital, does not significantly affect changes in the investment levels. This evidence is consistent with other studies evaluating the aggregate investment in Brazil (e.g., Luporini & Alves, 2016) and suggests that investment responses to past movements in real interest rates are close to zero. Our model also rejects any effects of the supply of credit and exchange rate variations on investment, but we find that investment is affected by past movements of EFPI-GDP (+) and L2.ΔCOMM (+) and also contemporaneously by RECESSION (−).…”
Section: Var Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We find that real interest rate, a proxy for the real rental price of capital, does not significantly affect changes in the investment levels. This evidence is consistent with other studies evaluating the aggregate investment in Brazil (e.g., Luporini & Alves, 2016) and suggests that investment responses to past movements in real interest rates are close to zero. Our model also rejects any effects of the supply of credit and exchange rate variations on investment, but we find that investment is affected by past movements of EFPI-GDP (+) and L2.ΔCOMM (+) and also contemporaneously by RECESSION (−).…”
Section: Var Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our estimates use monthly data from July 1999 to December 2013, totalizing 174 observations. The dependent variable (investment) is represented by the apparent consumption of capital goods, following Dos Santos et al (2016, 16 See Dos Santos et al (2016), Luporini and Alves (2010) and Dos Santos and Pires (2007;2009) who also use this variable in their estimations. 17 "Furthermore, applying Kalecki»s (1937) «principle of increasing risk», changes in the rate of interest have an impact on retained profits and thus on the willingness and the ability of firms to invest in capital stock."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also Hein (2014, Chapter 6),Bertella (2007) andBlecker (2002) for more information on the differences between neo-Kaleckian and post-Kaleckian investment function. 14 This reasoning, that implies that a competitive exchange rate would also increase the profit share of non-commodity producers» firms, shows the importance of the profit share in the investment function due to its link to the exchange rate.15 SeeDos Santos et al (2016), Feijo et al (2016 andLuporini and Alves (2010), who also use the real exchange rate in their investment functions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature (Keynes (1936 and1971;Luporini and Alves, 2007) also mentions that the level of public investment directed to infrastructure improvements and services can generate positive externalities for private investment, in addition to expanding the demand for inputs and services from the private sector which would favor economic growth that would, in turn, favor the availability of credit. If Gross Fixed Capital Formation has positive relationship with credit availability it is an indication that their higher levels are associated with increased availability of resources.…”
Section: Independent Variables -Xmentioning
confidence: 99%