2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332009000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central limit theorems for correlated variables: some critical remarks

Abstract: In this talk I first review at an elementary level a selection of central limit theorems, including some lesser known cases, for sums and maxima of uncorrelated and correlated random variables. I recall why several of them appear in physics. Next, I show that there is room for new versions of central limit theorems applicable to specific classes of problems. Finally, I argue that we have insufficient evidence that, as a consequence of such a theorem, q-Gaussians occupy a special place in statistical physics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hilhorst has introduced [90] two interesting and paradigmatic examples which illustrate the difficulty. One of them is presented in his article [91] in this same volume. We shall here discuss his other example, which we present in what follows.…”
Section: Central Limit Theorems and Q-fourier Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hilhorst has introduced [90] two interesting and paradigmatic examples which illustrate the difficulty. One of them is presented in his article [91] in this same volume. We shall here discuss his other example, which we present in what follows.…”
Section: Central Limit Theorems and Q-fourier Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics and limit distributions of constrained LFs are not well understood, except for processes subjected to long waiting times or in external potentials, mainly [8,31]. Several limit theorems also exist for specific problems of sums of correlated random variables [32], and a few random walks with infinite memory of their previous displacements have exactly solvable first moments [33][34][35]. Yet, very little is known on LFs composed of non-independent steps, in particular processes with self-attraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not so in general. Indeed, it has been shown by Hilhorst [Hilhorst, 2009[Hilhorst, , 2010 that, for a given value of q, one-parameter families of functions {f (x)} exist such that their q-FT does not depend on that parameter. Therefore the q-FT has not always an unique pre-image, i.e., although the q-FT is invertible within the closed class of q-Gaussians, it is not invertible in general.…”
Section: Q-fourier Transform and Discussion Of Its Inversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us incidentally mention that the lack of inverse of the q-FT has made Hilhorst [Hilhorst, 2009[Hilhorst, , 2010] to disregard q-Gaussians as attractors. A detailed reply to his claim has been recently made available in , which reinforces that q-Gaussians are, in many respects, very special distributions.…”
Section: Q-generalized Central Limit Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%