2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332007000400035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From integral to derivative dispersion relations

Abstract: We demonstrate that integral dispersion relations for hadron-hadron scattering amplitudes can be replaced by differential relations, without the usual high-energy approximation. We obtain analytical expressions for the corrections associated with the low energy region and exemplify the applicability of the novel relations in the context of an analytical parametrization for proton-proton and antiproton-proton total cross sections.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recall that, for classes of functions of interest in high-energy elastic scattering, DDR can be analytically extended down to 4-5 GeV [54,56] or even below and for the whole energy interval (above the physical threshold), either in the form of a double infinity series, as first deduced by Ávila and Menon [57,58], or in the form of a single series, as demonstrated by Ferreira and Sesma [59]. However it seems to us simpler here to consider the pragmatic role of the subtraction constant, since as explained above, with this constant as a free parameter the results obtained with the DDR (10) and (11) (high-energy approximation) are the same as those obtained through the IDR ( 8) and ( 9) (without the high-energy approximation).…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We recall that, for classes of functions of interest in high-energy elastic scattering, DDR can be analytically extended down to 4-5 GeV [54,56] or even below and for the whole energy interval (above the physical threshold), either in the form of a double infinity series, as first deduced by Ávila and Menon [57,58], or in the form of a single series, as demonstrated by Ferreira and Sesma [59]. However it seems to us simpler here to consider the pragmatic role of the subtraction constant, since as explained above, with this constant as a free parameter the results obtained with the DDR (10) and (11) (high-energy approximation) are the same as those obtained through the IDR ( 8) and ( 9) (without the high-energy approximation).…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As discussed in the last section this corresponds to the introduction of the effective subtraction constant as a free fit parameter in data reductions. The complete practical equivalence in data reductions between the IDR without the high energy approximation and the DDR with the subtraction constant as a free fit parameter is demonstrated in [72,79,80] and in more detail in [78]. The replacement of IDR by DDR has been also discussed by Cudell, Martynov and Selyugin [81,82] and more recently (2017) by Ferreira, Kohara and Sesma [83,84].…”
Section: C2 Derivative Dispersion Relations With the Effective Subtra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to our knowledge, the first results for the DDR taking into account the finite lower limit (i.e. without the high-energy approximation) and the effect of the primitive at both upper and lower limits were obtained by Ávila and Menon in 2005 [165,166]. The correction term can be expressed as a double infinite series 4 .…”
Section: Derivative Dispersion Relations With the Effective Subtracti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete practical equivalence in data reductions between the IDR without the high-energy approximation and the DDR with the subtraction constant as a free fit parameter is demonstrated by Ávila and Menon in Refs. [157,170,171] and in more detail by Ávila in Ref. [169].…”
Section: Derivative Dispersion Relations With the Effective Subtracti...mentioning
confidence: 99%